they are VERY used to this situation :)
> This past week, I was associating with some Linux professionals
Hell is other people
Jean-Paul Sartre
**
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
Archive:
This past week, I was associating with some Linux professionals and I wanted to
show them 4D. Since I did not have a licensed version of 4D with me at the
time, I attempted to install and run a demo version. Unfortunately, after a lot
of effort, and not being able to reach my usual sales people
I would love to see it restored, it was a benefit to the developers represented
and to decision makers wanting to see what 4D developers were in their area.
Could it be that this was a conflict with 4D’s own professional services? I
asked Michael (covering 4D sales) today, “when was the
I'm also curious because I previously used the link below to go to the partner
site and create tech support requests. This seemed like the only avenue to
report bugs for a non-beta version. Now it just redirects to https://us.4d.com.
http://partnercentral.4d.com/
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
> On Mar
For a very long while now, I’ve been missing my friend Randall Wolf….. I have
some suspicions on what could have happened but nothing confirmed. So, what
happened to Randall?
Thanks,
Robert
**
4D Internet Users Group (4D
One of the benefits of being a 4D partner was the ability to be represented in
the online solutions guide (previously shown on the 4D web site), when and why
did 4D take this away? Enquiring minds want to know!
Thanks,
Robert
Thanks to all for the responses.
While trying to resolve an issue with locked records, I watched my routine
for handling named selections function. When the named selection was
created I “had no current record” because no record was visible in the
debugger. When Use named selection executed, the
tim sent me his library, so maybe ask him, too. he does not want it in the
public domain, yet.
however, in the meantime, i discovered that we seem to have our own attempt
at a library, but i don't think we've tested it (at least i don't see any
notes about that).
please test and let me know if
An unloaded record can still be the current record.
also
ALL RECORDS([RecipeRec]) // has current record
LAST RECORD([RecipeRec]) // has current record
NEXT RECORD([RecipeRec]) // no current record
.
.
.
USE NAMED SELECTION("ASD") // no current record
> On Mar 13, 2020, at 8:05 AM, Chip Scheide
and I would read into that - IF there is no selected record, the command will
load the First Record
Chip
> Hi Douglas
>
>
> Doc says:
> When you create a named selection, the current record is “remembered” by the
> named selection. USE NAMED SELECTION retrieves the position of this record
>
I guess the right thing to do is to leave some room for the print maker,
forms should not be designed so precisely if there are meant to be
cross-platform.
what I can say ("been there, done that") is that you should probably not fight
against the feature,
for example, by adding extra points to
what you describe is a historic (and imperfect) behaviour of the stylesheets
feature.
there is no workaround, and you should not expect any fixes ever,
because undoing will screw up every form created in the last 15 years.
(it started with v2004.2 or thereabouts)
basically, what happens is that
Hi Douglas
Doc says:
When you create a named selection, the current record is “remembered” by the
named selection. USE NAMED SELECTION retrieves the position of this record
and makes the record the new current record; this command loads the current
record.
In your example, the first record is
13 matches
Mail list logo
