Re: [6tisch] 6TiSCH interop: 6LoRH and OSCOAP as a requirement?

Simon Duquennoy wrote: > Will single-hop communication work seamlessly between a 6LoRH node and > a non-6LoRH node? no. A 6loRH node could implement both, but in general, it is a flag day on the protocol. -- Michael Richardson ,

Re: [6tisch] 6TiSCH interop: 6LoRH and OSCOAP as a requirement?

> > The question is what happens in Contiki if you receive a Dispatch byte with a > page that is not 0, e.g 110001 what Contiki will do? > > Contiki does not implement paging dispatch (rfc8025), and will basically discard anything that is not covered in RFC 6282 such as a dispatch starting with

Re: [6tisch] 6TiSCH interop: 6LoRH and OSCOAP as a requirement?

Hi Simon (adding Tengfei as he can help also on this) 6LORH uses paging dispatch (rfc8025). This is a modification of the dispatch byte so 4 of the last bits are used to indicate a page. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Re: [6tisch] 6TiSCH interop: 6LoRH and OSCOAP as a requirement?

Thanks for the answers, but the thing I would really like to double-check here is: Will single-hop communication work seamlessly between a 6LoRH node and a non-6LoRH node? I don't know the details of 6LoRH and wonder how much the dispatch headers differ etc. -- in the single-hop case. Thanks!

Re: [6tisch] 6TiSCH interop: 6LoRH and OSCOAP as a requirement?

I'm going to add 6LoRH as requirement to implement for the td. Le mer. 21 juin 2017 à 12:07, Thomas Watteyne a écrit : > +1 > > There is only 1-2 tests that require multi-hop. > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen < > xvilajos...@uoc.edu> wrote:

Re: [6tisch] Fw: Qin comments on SF0

Perfect, thanks! On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Prof. Diego Dujovne < diego.dujo...@mail.udp.cl> wrote: > Thomas, > Yes, I got this e-mail (June 9th). > Regards, > > Diego > > > 2017-06-21 8:13 GMT-04:00 Thomas Watteyne : > >>

Re: [6tisch] Fw: Qin comments on SF0

Thomas, Yes, I got this e-mail (June 9th). Regards, Diego 2017-06-21 8:13 GMT-04:00 Thomas Watteyne : > Diego, > Can you confirm you got this e-mail? One thing that has worked well in the > past is to track issue raised in either

Re: [6tisch] Fw: Qin comments on SF0

Diego, Can you confirm you got this e-mail? One thing that has worked well in the past is to track issue raised in either the IETF issue tracker, or the tracker part of the repo of our draft. Just wanting to make sure we are not forgetting about comments. Thomas On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 5:02 PM,

[6tisch] Agenda, 23 June 2017 interim, 6TiSCH WG

Connection details - Date: 23 June 2017 7-8am Pacific - Webex link: https://cisco.webex.com/ciscosales/j.php?MTID=mcdbbe3a4e38d97d986b507ec12a1f9b1 Agenda - Administrivia [10min] - Agenda bashing - Approval minutes from last meeting - Addressing todo's from last

[6tisch] 6TiSCH Interoperability Event

Hi all, i'm planning to attend the Interop Event at Prague and i'd like to know if a rough timeline is already available for organizing my flights. Best regards | Mit freundlichen Grüßen Christian Hopfner Developer