Re: [6tisch] Question on draft-duquennoy-6tisch-asf-01

Simon, Any input? Thomas On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Cai Qi Hong wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question on ASF#3.1 > ( > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duquennoy-6tisch-asf-01#section-3.1) .

Re: [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-10

That looks good to me. I think it will help implementers. Thanks Brian Carpenter On 22/03/2018 21:41, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen wrote: > Dear Brian, > > after the WG meeting we proceed to resolve your pointed issue. Thanks so > much for going through the draft again. > > We will publish v11

Re: [6tisch] Updates to minimal-security-06

Mališa Vučinić schreef op 2018-03-22 18:15: On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:03 PM peter van der Stok wrote: One doubt I have is how does the JRC send the Observe response to the joined node, when the request came over a Join Proxy. Essentially, the JRC needs to send the

Re: [6tisch] Updates to minimal-security-06

Mališa Vučinić wrote: > in the network. Other than adding the Observe option, together with the > new link-layer key we also need to carry the ASN at which this key is > scheduled to be rolled out. What COSE parameter the ASN will be I disagree with this

Re: [6tisch] Updates to minimal-security-06

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:03 PM peter van der Stok wrote: > > > One doubt I have is how does the JRC send the Observe response to the > > joined node, when the request came over a Join Proxy. Essentially, the > > JRC needs to send the response to the global IPv6 address of

Re: [6tisch] Updates to minimal-security-06

One doubt I have is how does the JRC send the Observe response to the joined node, when the request came over a Join Proxy. Essentially, the JRC needs to send the response to the global IPv6 address of the joined node, that it never used before, but it is able to construct it, as it knows the

[6tisch] Updates to minimal-security-06

All, We had a couple of side discussions during IETF 101 on the updates to the minimal security draft. We need to (1) support extensibility to allow future specs to add additional parameters to the join response structure, and it seems that (2) we can cover link-layer rekeying easily through the

[6tisch] minutes and summary 6TiSCH WG meeting at IEFT101

All, You will find the minutes of the 6TiSCH WG meeting at IETF 101 at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/minutes-101-6tisch (formatted version: https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/meetings/wiki/180321_ietf101_london). You will find an executive summary of the outcome of the meeting at

Re: [6tisch] draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09 comments

That is perfect, thanks for confirming. On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen < xvilajos...@uoc.edu> wrote: > Dear Thomas, all, > > I will provide an answer today and modify the draft accordingly in the > following hours. V11 will be published by next week. > > regards > Xavi

Re: [6tisch] [IoT-DIR] Iotdir early review of draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09

Dear Alex, thanks so much for going through the document again. After the discussion at the WG meeting we can proceed to resolve your pointed issues. Inline with your questions we provide our answers. We will publish v11 of the draft in the following days including the resolution presented here.

Re: [6tisch] draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09 comments

Dear Thomas, all, I will provide an answer today and modify the draft accordingly in the following hours. V11 will be published by next week. regards Xavi 2018-03-22 11:31 GMT+01:00 Thomas Watteyne : > Lotte, > Thanks for the detailed comment, and for the

Re: [6tisch] draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-09 comments

Lotte, Thanks for the detailed comment, and for the discussions around the 6TiSCH WG meeting yesterday. Xavi, Per the meeting yesterday, I believe it's important these points make it into the draft, but I don't see any point which is extremely complicated to answer. Can you let the WG know about

Re: [6tisch] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-10

Dear Brian, after the WG meeting we proceed to resolve your pointed issue. Thanks so much for going through the draft again. We will publish v11 with the following update on the text as you suggested. We hope this clarifies your point. In section 3.1.1. 2-step 6P Transaction we added: Race