mcr> 1) What L2 address would the JP use in the Enhanced Beacon?
mcr> Could we mandate that whatever it uses there, that it also configure as
mcr> a valid l3 LL address? It doesn't have to use that address by default
mcr> for any other traffic.
mcr>
mcr> 2) we could
Hi Alexey,
Please see inline.
Thanks
Qin
-原始邮件-
发件人:"Alexey Melnikov"
发送时间:2018-04-20 18:48:55 (星期五)
收件人: "Qin Wang" , "Xavi Vilajosana Guillen"
抄送: tisch <6tisch@ietf.org>, "Pascal Thubert" ,
Hello Mališa
All the below makes sense to me and I agree with the general direction that you
are taking. Let’s see the final text – and don’t forget to signal in the join
that the LL derives from the MAC so on the way back we skip the look up!
Take care,
Pascal
From: Mališa Vučinić
Hi Pascal,
Thanks for the clarifications.
One point I strongly disagree with is about the cost of the ND exchange. ND
is indeed done on one-hop but in 6TiSCH case this maps to the* shared cell*,
where the collisions happen. Once we get pass that critical first hop,
things are much easier as we
Dear Georgios,
thanks so much for your detailed review. Let me answer inline.
The fixes will appear in a next version of the draft.
kind regards
Xavi
2018-04-09 11:26 GMT+02:00 Georgios Z. Papadopoulos <
georgios.papadopou...@imt-atlantique.fr>:
> Hello Xavi and co-authors,
>
> Many thanks
Hello Micheal:
>
> 1) What L2 address would the JP use in the Enhanced Beacon?
>Could we mandate that whatever it uses there, that it also configure as
>a valid l3 LL address? It doesn't have to use that address by default
>for any other traffic.
>
> 2) we could include the
Hi Qin,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018, at 9:51 PM, Qin Wang wrote:
>
> Hi Alexey,
>
> Thank you for your further comments. Please see inline.
>
> Qin
>
> On Thursday, April 12, 2018, 1:20:01 PM EDT, Alexey Melnikov
> wrote:>
>
> Hi Xavi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, at 4:39 PM,
Hello Mališa
The all-0 destination is tricky, not done anymore that I know off. Trying that
may get us through hell at 6MAN and/or IESG.
I think that as an RFC you must described the clean way and then the
optimizations when the LLs are based on EUI 64.
IMHO, the spec should say that:
-