> On 20 Sep 2021, at 12:54, Christian Amsüss wrote:
> I originally thought I'd just take a K1 and K2 and the existing key
> usage table, but these are actually 6TiSCH specific. It'd be quite a
> waste to repeat the 14 modes to say the same about any other MAC
> (especially as using the K1/K2
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 12:15:27PM +0200, Mališa Vučinić wrote:
> As you could probably see from RFC9031, we did make an attempt to
> separate TSCH-specific from generally-applicable text,
yes, thanks for that -- if that were not done, the endeavour would be a
lot harder.
> The use cases you
Hi Christian,
As you could probably see from RFC9031, we did make an attempt to separate
TSCH-specific from generally-applicable text, but we indeed never instantiated
it for non-TSCH setups and additional parameters would need to be registered
and described. I do concur that the biggest
Hello Michael,
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 03:48:44PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > have the discussions in the development of CoJP ever sidetracked to its
> > applicability for non-TSCH setups?
>
> not really.
thanks, that's good to know too.
> I think that the CoJP worked very very hard
