Re: [6tisch] Fwd: Change in wireshark[master]: 6LoWPAN: added dissection for 6LoRH. (RFC8138, RFC8025)

Congratulations :-) 2017-07-09 9:34 GMT+02:00 tengfei.chang : > That's great news! Thanks a lot! > > > > Sent from my Mi phone > On Jonathan Muñoz , Jul 9, 2017 9:27 AM wrote: > > Hello all, > > Just to inform you that Wireshark has been updated

Re: [6tisch] consolidating 6P/6LoRH Wireshark dissectors

Hello Yasuyuki, Le ven. 23 juin 2017 à 10:10, Yasuyuki Tanaka a écrit : > Development versions would have; they are available at the following page. > > https://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ Thanks :-) I didn't know this existed :-) > While I'm working

Re: [6tisch] 6TiSCH interop: 6LoRH and OSCOAP as a requirement?

I'm going to add 6LoRH as requirement to implement for the td. Le mer. 21 juin 2017 à 12:07, Thomas Watteyne a écrit : > +1 > > There is only 1-2 tests that require multi-hop. > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Xavi Vilajosana Guillen < > xvilajos...@uoc.edu> wrote:

Re: [6tisch] Question about TD

ransaction before 6N2 and locked the > resources. Note that the request message lock the resources. > > I want to hear other view as well about this. > > regards, > X > > 2017-06-19 18:14 GMT+02:00 Remy Leone <remy.le...@inria.fr>: > >> If it is a concurrent

[6tisch] Question about TD

Hello, I got a question about 6P04: obj: Check that concurrent transaction cannot request for the same cells in the schedule according to draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-05 cfg: star ref: IEEE802.15.4-2015, draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-05 pre: - The DAGroot sends EBs periodically,

Re: [6tisch] First version of 4th 6TiSCH plugfest test description

; >>>> It says a ping echo request packet is used to test the timing template. >>>> I think we shouldn't use layer 3 packets to test layer 2 behaviors. >>>> >>>> What other layer 2 packet can we use for this test? keep alive packet >>>> can

[6tisch] First version of 4th 6TiSCH plugfest test description

Hello, I created a pull request containing the test descriptions program for the next plugfest. https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/td-6tisch/pull-requests/5/ietf99/diff It's the first draft. It will be discussed on Friday and the final one will be published on June 15th. Once this list of test

[6tisch] First pass upon the test description

Hello, I've reviewed the 6TiSCH test description and I got some suggestions that I've written as issues: https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/td-6tisch/issues?status=new=open Could you please comment, open new issues if you see some. My goal is to have as many test descriptions phrased with Falsifiable

Re: [6tisch] First version of git-tracked test description

ues directly > through the tracker rather than the ML, but would very much appreciate if > you could keep the WG updated with major developments. > Thomas > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Remy Leone <remy.le...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> No problem. >> I've activated

Re: [6tisch] First version of git-tracked test description

at sounds great. Having a CI keeping an up-to-date version of the PDF > version at all times seems like the best of all worlds. Thanks for doing > the conversion exercise! > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Remy Leone <remy.le...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> I would like to use

Re: [6tisch] First version of git-tracked test description

l > files into e.g. a PDF version of the TD? > > On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Remy Leone <remy.le...@inria.fr> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I've just pushed a first version of the 6TiSCH test description in the >> following repository: >> >> htt

[6tisch] First version of git-tracked test description

Hello, I've just pushed a first version of the 6TiSCH test description in the following repository: https://bitbucket.org/6tisch/td-6tisch I've used the content present in the test description document provided by ETSI during 6TiSCH plugtest events. Using a git-based workflow to change those

Re: [6tisch] Comments/questions about 6P draft

écrit : > Hi Remy, > > Regarding to your question on 4.2.6. 6P CellOptions, the first column is > the cell's type from node A's point of view, and the second column is the > cell's type from node B's point of view. Does it make sense? > > Thanks > Qin > > > On Thursda

[6tisch] Comments/questions about 6P draft

Hello, I got a bunch of remarks about the 6P draft https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-03 *4.1.1. 2-step 6top Transaction* *4.1.2. 3-step 6top Transaction* Maybe it would be nice to add at the end of the workflow that if the transaction was successful, the schedule