Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO

2016-05-19 Thread S.V.R.Anand
...@ece.iisc.ernet.in] *Sent:* jeudi 19 mai 2016 08:17 *To:* Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com>; Prof. Diego Dujovne <diego.dujo...@mail.udp.cl> *Cc:* 6tisch@ietf.org; draft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-...@tools.ietf.org *Subject:* Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO Hi Pascal, I agr

Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO

2016-05-19 Thread S.V.R.Anand
*Prof. Diego Dujovne *Sent:* 2016年5月19日21:40 *To:* Pascal Thubert (pthubert) *Cc:* 6tisch@ietf.org; S.V.R.Anand; draft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-...@tools.ietf.org *Subject:* Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO Pascal, Anand: What I would propose is SF1 for this p

Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO

2016-05-19 Thread Prof. Diego Dujovne
f.org; draft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-...@tools.ietf.org > > *Subject:* Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO > > > > Hi Pascal, > > I agree with your view. We certainly seem to require a service sub-layer > that > provides link layer abstraction by offering ways of o

Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO

2016-05-19 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
raft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-...@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO Hi Pascal, I agree with your view. We certainly seem to require a service sub-layer that provides link layer abstraction by offering ways of obtaining links with desired properties that the use

Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO

2016-05-19 Thread S.V.R.Anand
...@mail.udp.cl] *Sent:* vendredi 13 mai 2016 17:08 *To:* Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com> *Cc:* draft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-...@tools.ietf.org; 6tisch@ietf.org *Subject:* Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO Dear all, During today's webex call, I presented a slide

Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO

2016-05-13 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
o:diego.dujo...@mail.udp.cl>] Sent: vendredi 13 mai 2016 17:08 To: Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com<mailto:pthub...@cisco.com>> Cc: draft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:draft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-...@tools.ietf.org>; 6tisch@ietf.org<mailto:6tisch@ietf

Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO

2016-05-13 Thread Prof. Diego Dujovne
rof. Diego Dujovne [mailto:diego.dujo...@mail.udp.cl] > *Sent:* vendredi 13 mai 2016 17:08 > *To:* Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthub...@cisco.com> > *Cc:* draft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-...@tools.ietf.org; 6tisch@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO > >

Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO

2016-05-13 Thread Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
) <pthub...@cisco.com> Cc: draft-dujovne-6tisch-6top-...@tools.ietf.org; 6tisch@ietf.org Subject: Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO Dear all, During today's webex call, I presented a slide where the comments below were going to be addressed on the next version of the

Re: [6tisch] My adoption-time review of SFO

2016-05-13 Thread Prof. Diego Dujovne
Dear all, During today's webex call, I presented a slide where the comments below were going to be addressed on the next version of the draft. However, I raised the point about: Ø 4. Rules for CellList Why is this here? Which cell are allocated is not SF0 ‘s business,