Hi Michael,
thanks for a clear answer.
I think the Registrar/JCE will need to support three protocols:
1) a push protocol over CoAP.
2) a pull protocol (RFC7030/EST).
3) a protocol to talk to the MASA (TBD)
As discussed earlier, having a push/pull agnostic protocol would be
nice. (and prob
Hi Michael,
all in favor of one approach to merge the push/pull aspects. (I have to
understand the protocol exchange below, but it looks feasibale)
I am not sure about understanding EDHOC, but may be that is not
important.
I still see all the mime formats. is that phase 1?
Is phase 2 then swi
Hi Yasuyuki,
I think nodeA=>nodeB request process includes two parts, one is Tx from nodeA
to nodeB, another part is for nodeB's MAC to process the Request message. As
you mentioned, failure of the first part can be identified by mac-ack from
nodeB, but not the second part. Right?
ThanksQin
Hi Qin,
I think nodeA=>nodeB request process includes two parts, one is Tx
from nodeA to nodeB, another part is for nodeB's MAC to process the
Request message. As you mentioned, failure of the first part can be
identified by mac-ack from nodeB, but not the second part. Right?
Yes, that's right
HI Yatch,
thanks for your comments. Could you please summarize how the timeout will
work in the 2 and 3 step transactions:
I see it in this way:
2-step
A sends to B an ADD, if A packet is lost, B will never realize and A will
timeout. Idem if B response fails ( A timeouts)
3-step
A sends to B an
