I'm pretty sure the line 7 isn't part of the halting procedure. It just
indicates that it's time for fossil to do a new snapshot which isn't
possible because the file system is halted. So just believe fshalt when it
claims it is done.
* Antonin Vecera ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello all,
I
In the Linux world kvlade looks the way to go for performance but it
didn't work on AMD64 when I tried it. I guess the Coraid boxes make Plan
9 go fast enough so I just need to stop worrying about it.
plan 9 is a good platform; it is very speedy and doesn't do anything
to you. we didn't need
Indeed,
I have been toying around with the idea of building a larger scale
version of Mr. Minnich's lunchbox using Mini-ITX boards..
But I have no justification, since virtually everything i need to do
with plan 9 happens impossibly fast on just a simple vmware instance.
Plan9 is sufficiently
just a little warning for upas/smtpd users.
/mail/lib/smtpd.conf ournets is carte blanche
to relay email and modern windows viruses are
good at finding mail servers. so it's best
to limit ournets to the smallest possible set.
if you're not forwarding email to plan 9
from another machine with no
Indeed,
I have been toying around with the idea of building a larger scale
version of Mr. Minnich's lunchbox using Mini-ITX boards..
But I have no justification, since virtually everything i need to do
with plan 9 happens impossibly fast on just a simple vmware instance.
Plan9 is
Hi,
I want to setup my new plan9 termnial with a UK keyboard. I found kbmap
but this appears to be an interactive program. Even if you do
kbmap /sys/lib/kbmap/uk
it still acts in an interactive manner. Is this right?
A qick glance at the code reveals that
cp
IIRC, putting kbmap=uk
in plan9.ini should work.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Robert Hibberdine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to setup my new plan9 termnial with a UK keyboard. I found kbmap but
this appears to be an interactive program. Even if you do
kbmap
From: roger peppe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
one thing that has bugged me in the past: upas relies on file -m to
determine the type of attachments, but file only reads the first block
of the file, so if you've got a utf-8 file with the first non-ascii character
beyond the 8192nd byte, you get
coming as no suprise, the pc port of plan 9
does work just fine with 8 cores.
mpls; cat /dev/sysstat
0 14271 21350133991116 0
0 0 99 0
19116 1051772279 812 0
coming as no suprise, the pc port of plan 9
does work just fine with 8 cores.
Just out of interest, what's the machine?
winmail.dat
Which hardware platform is that?
-mlw
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of erik quanstrom
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:29 PM
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: [9fans] 8 cores
coming as no suprise, the pc port of plan 9 does work just fine with 8
On 15-Jul-08, at 1:01 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
I suspect a lot of this complexity will end up being dropped
when you don't have to worry about efficiently using the last
N% of cpu cycles.
Would that I weren't working on a multi-core graphics part... That N%
is what the game is all about.
add this one to the list:
http://9fans.net/archive/2003/12/182
I'd like to ask a question, but before I do, feel I should say, I've been on
this list long enough to understand that Plan 9 is a research vessel, not an OS
that's targeted at commercial deployment...
That being said, while huge scalability is certainly research-worthy, does
anyone actually
14 matches
Mail list logo
