Where's the FAQ for this newsgroup? Thanks.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Pietro Gagliardi pietr...@mac.com wrote:
On Feb 4, 2009, at 10:58 PM, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
also, can you please remove debugging output from 9fans?
What do you mean? Could you paste the raw text data for one of my emails?
PGP for Mac Mail hides
Assuming SHA-1 is indeed cryptographically secure (which is the
assumption made by the venti paper)
Well, I read it like it was just sufficiently secure against
unintended collisions.
It's not intended to encrypt, but to efficiently store data.
While SHA-1 is indeed not intended to
On Feb 5, 2009, at 10:32, Keith Thompson wrote:
Where's the FAQ for this newsgroup? Thanks.
No dedicated FAQ for this mailing list that I know of, but there's a
Plan 9 FAQ on the wiki at http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/
FAQ/ .
Cheers
Robert
I am running the admittedly somewhat odd vac command
phlogiston% vac \
-d ... -q \
-f ... \
-h ... \
-e acme/acid/386 -e acme/acid/alpha -e acme/acid/arm \
-e acme/acid/mips -e acme/acid/power -e acme/bin/386 \
-e acme/bin/alpha -e acme/bin/arm -e
What do you mean? Could you paste the raw text data for one of my
emails? PGP for Mac Mail hides everything.
i considered adding code to upas to at least
strip pgp nonesense from message bodies. but this
would require upas to know things about what
message bodies look like after mime is
erik quanstrom wrote:
next we'll be replacing :-) (':' '-' ')' for those with impaired mail
readers) with a jpeg.
This is Plan 9: replace it with ☺.
—Joel
That was even faster than I expected. Thanks Russ!
uriel
P.S.: Silly question, why is du(1) not built by default in p9p? The
code already there seems to work as far as I can tell..
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Russ Cox r...@swtch.com wrote:
Sed is fixed in plan9port.
$ hg diff sed.c
diff
erik quanstrom wrote:
next we'll be replacing :-) (':' '-' ')' for those with impaired mail
readers) with a jpeg.
This is Plan 9: replace it with ☺.
clearly. tcs -f emoticon anyone? ☺
the point i'm trying to make is that ☺ is
not the same as :-). i find it irritating that
some mail
i considered adding code to upas to at least
strip pgp nonesense from message bodies. but this
would require upas to know things about what
message bodies look like after mime is done with
them.
FWIW I have several sources of mail which have large, unnecessary disclaimers,
adverts,
FWIW I have several sources of mail which have large, unnecessary disclaimers,
adverts, signatures etc on them. I have a serise of test in
/mail/box/steve/pipeto
along the lines of:
if (grep -s 'Forum Subscription New Topic Notification' $D/subject){
bin/powerboard $D
P.S.: Silly question, why is du(1) not built by default in p9p? The
code already there seems to work as far as I can tell..
It's a long story, dating back to when the standard mode of
operation was to put $PLAN9/bin ahead of the system binaries
in your $PATH. In that context it didn't make
Even if venti scores are completely unguessable,
using them as an authentication mechanism
is a mistake, because you can't change them.
It would be like having a fixed, unchangeable password
assigned to your account: once the password leaked
out into the world, one way or another, you'd have
no
http://www.google.com/search?q=09+f9;
is that a legal url?
- erik
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 12:41 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?q=09+f9;
is that a legal url?
I don't think it is a legal URL, but most browsers
will turn it into a legal one before issuing a
GET request.
Thanks,
Roman.
P.S. Or am I missing some kind of a joke here?
http://www.google.com/search?q=09+f9;
is that a legal url?
P.S. Or am I missing some kind of a joke here? ;-)
Intentional or not, it's a very good joke.
Micah
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 10:22 -0800, Micah Stetson wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?q=09+f9;
is that a legal url?
P.S. Or am I missing some kind of a joke here? ;-)
Intentional or not, it's a very good joke.
but...but...erik always adds that look-i-am-using-plan9-smiley
to all of
http://www.google.com/search?q=09+f9;
is that a legal url?
- erik
fortune worthy :D
but...but...erik always adds that look-i-am-using-plan9-smiley
to all of his jokes. i'm so confused...
i do? i guess ya learn something every day.
- erik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I misunderstood what they meant by debugging. PGP is doing nothing
wrong; I thought there was debugging info in the email.
On Feb 5, 2009, at 8:16 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
What do you mean? Could you paste the raw text data for one of my
the sd raw file is one of the really cool things about
plan 9. while the raw file works pretty well on ata
devices, there are some things you can't get.
so i spent a little bit working out this problem.
there is a paper at http://www.quanstro.net/plan9/atazz.pdf
i promise this link is legal. it
I misunderstood what they meant by debugging. PGP is doing nothing
wrong; I thought there was debugging info in the email.
On Feb 5, 2009, at 8:16 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
What do you mean? Could you paste the raw text data for one of my
emails? PGP for Mac Mail hides everything.
i
I misunderstood what they meant by debugging. PGP is doing nothing
wrong; I thought there was debugging info in the email.
imho, it is against the spirit of MIME to put
encoded data in a text/plain body. your
other post points out why funky non-standard
encodings are a problem.
it would be
Cool, thanks again!
uriel
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Russ Cox r...@swtch.com wrote:
P.S.: Silly question, why is du(1) not built by default in p9p? The
code already there seems to work as far as I can tell..
It's a long story, dating back to when the standard mode of
operation was to
2009/2/4 Pietro Gagliardi pietr...@mac.com:
PGP for Mac Mail hides everything.
upas and GMail have this capability also, but you might
find it more favourable to simply consider others on the
list, as well as the worth of the information you decide
to include.
filter:
from: pietr...@mac.com
PGP for Mac Mail hides everything.
upas and GMail have this capability also, but you might
No, I ecperience the same annoying PGP SIGNATURE stuff on gmail.
2009/2/5 hiro 23h...@googlemail.com:
PGP for Mac Mail hides everything.
upas and GMail have this capability also, but you might
No, I ecperience the same annoying PGP SIGNATURE stuff on gmail.
hiding falls out naturally from automated filtration/deletion
2009/1/28 Dave Eckhardt davide...@cs.cmu.edu:
The one written by CMU students has been tested on a bunch
of Intel hardware and knows how to work around busted
motherboards which don't clock samples at the right rate
(apparently this was popular at some point).
The other one has better code
28 matches
Mail list logo
