Re: [9fans] Why not work for a company based on Plan 9?

2010-11-25 Thread Peter Penzin
Hi, Brantley, Do you have internships for MS students? I'm in Portland, OR now and i can't move anywhere until summer, because i'm a full-time student. Cheers -Peter 2010/10/25 Brantley Coile : > hi guys, > > as most on this list know, coraid makes storage devices that use plan 9 as > the so

Re: [9fans] Video mode problem after installation on QEMU

2010-11-25 Thread Lucio De Re
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 01:32:25PM +, Artem Novikov wrote: > > 1. *nomp=1 set by default after installation > 2. --- plan9.ini.cd > Hm. My approach would be to try to build 9pcf from sources as at the same date as 9pcflop.gz, probably build both and see how closely they match what gets insta

Re: [9fans] Video mode problem after installation on QEMU

2010-11-25 Thread Artem Novikov
On 25 ноя, 17:12, lu...@proxima.alt.za (Lucio De Re) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:46:15AM +, Artem Novikov wrote: > > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:46:15 GMT > > From: Artem Novikov > > To: 9f...@9fans.net > > Subject: Re: [9fans] Video mode problem after installation on QEMU > > > On 24 н

Re: [9fans] Video mode problem after installation on QEMU

2010-11-25 Thread Lucio De Re
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:46:15AM +, Artem Novikov wrote: > Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 09:46:15 GMT > From: Artem Novikov > To: 9fans@9fans.net > Subject: Re: [9fans] Video mode problem after installation on QEMU > > On 24 ноя, 20:52, quans...@quanstro.net (erik quanstrom) wrote: > 1. I compared

Re: [9fans] Video mode problem after installation on QEMU

2010-11-25 Thread Artem Novikov
On 24 ноя, 20:52, quans...@quanstro.net (erik quanstrom) wrote: > > Thanks for the replies. > > 1. -vga std/vmware options on QEMU have no effect > > 2. bit mode change has no effect too (only "artefact line" on top of > > blank screen change its color) > > 3. during installation or booting from CD

Re: [9fans] Plan9 development

2010-11-25 Thread Greg Comeau
In article , Federico G. Benavento wrote: >isn't this redundant with cpp(1)'s __FUNCTION__? > >if __FUNCTION__ isn't standard, then we should change >it to __func__ in cpp and that's it I'm not sure what cpp's __FUNCTION__ is, but be careful, as it's easy to loose some semantics in subtle ways a