Robert Ransom pointed out offlist that the pak crypto is flawed in this
draft so its back to the drawing board. please consider this version
of the draft retracted :-)
> If an attacker can find scalars s1 and s2 such that s1*H(p1) =
> s2*H(p2), then he can send s1*H(p1) as his public key, receive
On 19 October 2015 at 20:31, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> I seem to remember IL being more complex than just a UDP with counters
> and ACK, which is what I'm - sort of - looking for.
>
I think you might find Plan 9's rudp is essentially that. Conversations are
determined by
a generation number; pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:31:43 +0200
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:15:13 -0700
> >Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:36:55 +0200
>Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7738449.html (no Google allowed)
>
> I only read the abstract and found "pathstar" mentioned in references.
> - From a Bell Labs Technical Journal, no l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:28:13 +0200
>hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Do I understand correctly, you just want to avoid having to implement
> the complexities of TCP on an fpga? If there was a TCP IP core would
> you buy it?
> Why does VNC require an
sorry, typoed the url:
http://felloff.net/usr/cinap_lenrek/newticket.txt
--
cinap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:59:44 -0700
>erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> On Sun Oct 18 16:16:59 PDT 2015, 9...@9netics.com wrote:
> > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw
> > > one a year ago, but I just can't remember what it was!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:15:13 -0700
>Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> wrote:
>
> > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw
> > one a year ago, but I just can't remember what it was!
>
> are you looking for Internet Link (IL
requesting comments and questions.
later versions of this draft may be found under:
http://felloff.net/usr/cinap_lenrel/newticket.txt
Abstract:
The goal of this crypto scheme is to replace DES in the Plan 9 authentication
and to augment the authentication server with an authenticated key exchan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:14:46 +0100
>Charles Forsyth wrote:
>
> On 18 October 2015 at 23:43, Aleksandar Kuktin
> wrote:
>
> > BAM! I run straight into RUDP. "Designed at Bell Labs for the Plan 9
> > operating system". I just skimmed through the (exp
Do I understand correctly, you just want to avoid having to implement
the complexities of TCP on an fpga? If there was a TCP IP core would
you buy it?
Why does VNC require an fpga, are you going to transfer enormous resolutions?
If yes then I personally would use UDP and a lossy and loss tolerant
c
On 18 October 2015 at 23:43, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> BAM! I run straight into RUDP. "Designed at Bell Labs for the Plan 9
> operating system". I just skimmed through the (expired) IETF draft from
> 1999 and I honestly think the design might be too much. It looks like
> it's almost completely l
12 matches
Mail list logo