Re: [9fans] Fwd: Call for Papers: LASER 2012—Learning from Authoritative Security Experiment Results

2012-01-11 Thread Wes Kussmaul
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 22:19 -0800, ron minnich wrote: > This is kind of a fun one: stuff that DID NOT work. I like the basic > idea ... > “failures” may actually provide clues to even more significant > results than the original experimenter had intended. The research is > useful, even though th

Re: [9fans] Fwd: Call for Papers: LASER 2012—Learning from Authoritative Security Experiment Results

2012-01-11 Thread Bruce Ellis
Can I get away with designing something at the pub which I know is flawed and then writing it up? Are you sure this isn't from The Onion? On 11 January 2012 17:19, ron minnich wrote: > This is kind of a fun one: stuff that DID NOT work. I like the basic idea > ... > > ron > -- brucee Don't m

Re: [9fans] Fwd: Call for Papers: LASER 2012?Learning from Authoritative Security Experiment Results

2012-01-11 Thread tlaronde
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:19:36PM -0800, ron minnich wrote: > This is kind of a fun one: stuff that DID NOT work. I like the basic idea I generally learn more from what I do wrong than from what I do right--- sometimes because when "it works", it is not absolutely for the reasons I had explicitel

[9fans] Fwd: Call for Papers: LASER 2012—Learning from Authoritative Security Experiment Results

2012-01-10 Thread ron minnich
This is kind of a fun one: stuff that DID NOT work. I like the basic idea ... ron -- Forwarded message -- From: Edward Talbot Date: Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:48 PM Subject: Call for Papers: LASER 2012—Learning from Authoritative Security Experiment Results To: Ronald Minnich Ron