On 15 February 2011 08:08, Fernan Bolando fernanbola...@mailc.net wrote:
i have always considered 9atom and a few other independent plan9 stuff
as something similar to the openbsd release strategy. Theres a stable
release and a current. 9atom is more like openbsd-current it's
bleeding edge,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Eugene Gorodinsky
e.gorodin...@gmail.com wrote:
This question has been bugging me for some time and I haven't found any
discussions on the matter. It seems that at least the devices support could
go into the original plan9 kernel. What's the reason for having a
Ask Geoff :)
I think, that plan9 code-base is used somewhere else at Alcatel-Lucent. :)
2011/2/14 Eugene Gorodinsky e.gorodin...@gmail.com
Any specific rules as to which changes are going to be accepted and which
are not?
2011/2/14 Anthony Sorace a...@9srv.net
No big mystery: the Bell
On Mon Feb 14 02:01:04 EST 2011, e.gorodin...@gmail.com wrote:
Been there, done that. Not a line of text saying why 9atom appeared
nor why the changes are not merged back into plan9.
there was at least one person i told that a certain bit of
atom hardware works great, only to find out that it
This question has been bugging me for some time and I haven't found any
discussions on the matter. It seems that at least the devices support could
go into the original plan9 kernel. What's the reason for having a fork?
Hello ! :)
Go to the http://www.quanstro.net/plan9/9atom/ and read the few lines of
text.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Eugene Gorodinsky
e.gorodin...@gmail.comwrote:
This question has been bugging me for some time and I haven't found any
discussions on the matter. It seems that at least
Been there, done that. Not a line of text saying why 9atom appeared nor why
the changes are not merged back into plan9.
2011/2/13 Sergey Zhilkin szhil...@gmail.com
Hello ! :)
Go to the http://www.quanstro.net/plan9/9atom/ and read the few lines of
text.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:49 PM,
No big mystery: the Bell Labs folks are more
conservative about folding in certain kinds
of changes than Erik is.
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Any specific rules as to which changes are going to be accepted and which
are not?
2011/2/14 Anthony Sorace a...@9srv.net
No big mystery: the Bell Labs folks are more
conservative about folding in certain kinds
of changes than Erik is.