Hi
I'm aware of XeTeX (I had mentioned XeLaTeX in an earlier thread), and
yes, I understand one wouldn't be looking for identity with what other
platforms support. I agree that one shouldn't be looking to ape, but
rather to provide the same or more functionality in a better way.
Perhaps I'll be
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Karljurgen Feuerherm kfeuerh...@wlu.ca wrote:
It occurred to me that a profitable thing to do here would be to mention some
things that would be nice to see in a new improved TeX... I believe
bidirectional was mentioned already.
The other thing that is
So it compiles without ado under Plan9! And it's pure C89 (POSIX is just
for the framework, not for the code: I have removed unneeded
dependencies). And it's all the latest versions of the programs.
So some numbers:
- You will need to download a bundle of 4 chunks (I will put all on
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:57:56PM +0200, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
...
Nice work. Can't wait to try it.
--
I am a man who does not exist for others.
pgp5W3AtIaNFY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Nice work!
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 4:57 AM, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
So it compiles without ado under Plan9! And it's pure C89 (POSIX is just
for the framework, not for the code: I have removed unneeded
dependencies). And it's all the latest versions of the programs.
So some numbers:
Hello!
Congratulations!
Have you any plans to adapt the TeX for UTF-8 input?
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:57:56 +0400, tlaro...@polynum.com
tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
So it compiles without ado under Plan9! And it's pure C89 (POSIX is just
for the framework, not for the code: I have removed
LaTeX does too. I have used it with a recent version of TeX Live to
get greek and mathematical symbols in verbatim code listings.
James
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Karljurgen Feuerherm kfeuerh...@wlu.ca wrote:
XeTeX/XeLaTeX do this, I believe... Perhaps they can be ported at some
point?
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:07:14 +0400, Karljurgen Feuerherm
kfeuerh...@wlu.ca wrote:
XeTeX/XeLaTeX do this, I believe... Perhaps they can be ported at some
point?
IFAIK, XeTeX/XeLaTeX based on C++ code.
K
Karljürgen G. Feuerherm, PhD
Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies
1. IFAIK? Can't find that anywhere...
2. Is C++ a problem? Not supported by Plan9?
K
Alexander Sychev santu...@gmail.com 16/04/2010 10:27:36 am
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:07:14 +0400, Karljurgen Feuerherm
kfeuerh...@wlu.ca wrote:
XeTeX/XeLaTeX do this, I believe... Perhaps they can be
2. Is C++ a problem? Not supported by Plan9?
not supported by the plan 9 compilers.
- erik
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On Behalf Of
Karljurgen Feuerherm
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 12:20 PM
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Subject: Re: [9fans] TeX: hurrah!
1. IFAIK? Can't find that anywhere...
2. Is C++ a problem? Not supported by Plan9
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Patrick Kelly kameo76...@gmail.com wrote:
Object-Orientation reduces static provability.
True (or true enough)?
Not to engender a flame war, but my gut says there must be some
Eiffel, Smalltalk, and LISP folk out there who are big on provability,
but I can
This doesn't make much sense to me. Object-orientation in itself is simply
another level of data abstraction. And for the rest, I think provability is
more theoretical than practical, other than the most trivial programmes.
I'm beginning to get the impression (or perhaps more accurately am
I'm beginning to get the impression (or perhaps
more accurately am increasingly getting the
impression) that the plan9 community is reactionary
rather than progressive... not a good characteristic
if one is trying to make advances in comparison with
one's predecessors...
i think the plan 9
One question. Anyone tried get LaTeX on this TeX port?
What are the missing pieces to make it run on it?
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:17 PM, erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
I'm beginning to get the impression (or perhaps
more accurately am increasingly getting the
impression) that the
: Friday, April 16, 2010 1:05 PM
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
Subject: Re: [9fans] TeX: hurrah!
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Patrick Kelly kameo76...@gmail.com wrote:
Object-Orientation reduces static provability.
True (or true enough)?
Not to engender a flame war, but my gut
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Alexander Sychev santu...@gmail.com wrote:
IFAIK, XeTeX/XeLaTeX based on C++ code.
XeTeX itself is based on patches to Knuth's WEB source code for TeX.
It's the PDF-producing section (xdvipdf or some such) that's written
using a C++ library for handling PDF.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 07:46:08PM +0200, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote:
One question. Anyone tried get LaTeX on this TeX port?
What are the missing pieces to make it run on it?
I will release/publish the things on Monday I think.
In theory, if LaTeX is still a set of macros, it should work
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On Behalf Of
Karljurgen Feuerherm
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 1:11 PM
To: 'Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs'
Subject: Re: [9fans] TeX: hurrah!
This doesn't make much sense to me. Object-orientation in itself is simply
another
Ok--so it's agreed that it's not OO that's the problem, it's the users, then,
who don't know which tool to use when. Not at all the same thing.
And to be pedantic, since you give this example, the sun does revolve around
the earth, so long as you choose the earth as your point of reference...
Sorry to be a grouch, but can we change this thread to OO instead of the
advertised TeX:hurrah! thread?
I'm interested in the TeX news, but not so interested in the OO/language
debate that no doubt will go on for a while...
Thanks!
-joe
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Karljurgen Feuerherm
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [mailto:9fans-boun...@9fans.net] On Behalf Of
Karljurgen Feuerherm
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2010 2:15 PM
To: 'Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs'
Subject: Re: [9fans] TeX: hurrah!
Ok--so it's agreed that it's not OO that's the problem, it's the users, then,
who
This page and its links maybe be interesting for understanding the
relationship between latex and tex:
http://www.tug.org/levels.html
In my area of computer science all publications are written in latex
and for a particular conference/journal a latex class or style file (I
must admit to not
Thanks for this.
And yes, indeed, a step in the right direction!
Best
K
James Chapman ja...@cs.ioc.ee 16/04/2010 2:37:20 pm
This page and its links maybe be interesting for understanding the
relationship between latex and tex:
http://www.tug.org/levels.html
In my area of computer
It occurred to me that a profitable thing to do here would be to mention some
things that would be nice to see in a new improved TeX... I believe
bidirectional was mentioned already.
The other thing that is essential for folk like me is complete Unicode
compatibility [Yes, I know. UTC has
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Karljurgen Feuerherm kfeuerh...@wlu.ca wrote:
It occurred to me that a profitable thing to do here would be to mention some
things that would be nice to see in a new improved TeX... I believe
bidirectional was mentioned already.
The other thing that is
26 matches
Mail list logo
