Dan Cross wrote in
:
|On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 10:37 AM Charles Forsyth
| wrote:
|> It was the different characteristics of hard drives, even decent \
|> SATA, compared to SSD and nvme that I had in mind.
...
|In short, when you change storage technologies, assumptions that were
|made with,
Things like wear leveling are done by the FTL (flash translation layer) in the
firmware. Other things it does: erase before write, logical to physical
mapping, erasing blocks, garbage collection (moving live data around to free up
whole blocks) etc. Typically ease blocks are 128KB or larger but
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 10:37 AM Charles Forsyth
wrote:
> It was the different characteristics of hard drives, even decent SATA,
> compared to SSD and nvme that I had in mind.
Since details have been requested about this. I wouldn't presume to
speak from Charles, but some of those differences
It was the different characteristics of hard drives, even decent SATA,
compared to SSD and nvme that I had in mind.
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 15:30, Charles Forsyth
wrote:
> zfs is very big, complicated and the code looks ancient. I did not enjoy
> working with it.
>
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 08:51,
zfs is very big, complicated and the code looks ancient. I did not enjoy
working with it.
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 08:51, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> fixing another couple deadlocks makes you finally consider ditching fossil?
> zfs storage isn't always permanent either, for example if you use
fixing another couple deadlocks makes you finally consider ditching fossil?
zfs storage isn't always permanent either, for example if you use
encryption or deduplication.
On 4/6/23, Lucio De Re wrote:
> On 4/6/23, n...@pixelhero.dev wrote:
>> Quoth Charles Forsyth :
>>> fussing about certain
On 4/6/23, n...@pixelhero.dev wrote:
> Quoth Charles Forsyth :
>> fussing about certain things for hard drives that probably don't matter
>> for
>> SSD let alone nvme
>
> I am once again asking you to be more specific, please :)
>
> I have Plans for improving venti for myself, it'd be great to
Quoth Charles Forsyth :
> fussing about certain things for hard drives that probably don't matter for
> SSD let alone nvme
> certain things
I am once again asking you to be more specific, please :)
I have Plans for improving venti for myself, it'd be great to actually
have a specific list of
fussing about certain things for hard drives that probably don't matter for
SSD let alone nvme
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 23:04, wrote:
> Quoth Charles Forsyth :
> > Fossil works hard to do certain things that now we probably wouldn't
> bother
> > to do.
>
> Such as?
>
Quoth Anthony Martin :
> Noam, can you reproduce your problem with the above patch?
Just from reading the patch: yes, with ~95% confidence.
The logic it's fixing is completely unrelated.
So: thanks! Now I can import that patch and have *another* deadlock fixed!
Are there any other patches I
Charles Forsyth once said:
> It's funny that usually "it wasn't me" is used when breaking things. here
> it's fixing them, but I'm fairly sure "it wasn't me" that fixed it.
It was Richard Miller in 2012.
https://9p.io/sources/patch/applied/fossil-snap-deadlock/
Quoth Charles Forsyth :
> Fossil works hard to do certain things that now we probably wouldn't bother
> to do.
Such as?
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T354fe702e1e9d5e9-M8a784194389d102772df0a9e
Delivery options:
One of the nice things about several of the papers at iwp9 was the implied
or express reconsidering of secondary storage given various types of modern
technology.
Fossil works hard to do certain things that now we probably wouldn't bother
to do.
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 21:44, Charles Forsyth
It's funny that usually "it wasn't me" is used when breaking things. here
it's fixing them, but I'm fairly sure "it wasn't me" that fixed it.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T354fe702e1e9d5e9-Md75914502384917e733de7a4
it definitely was not me. My bet would be on rsc, geoff, richard,
forsyth, quanstrom or djc.
On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 11:05 AM Steve Simon wrote:
>
>
> was this hard to reproduce?
>
> i have not seen fossil deadlocking and have used it since i installed my
> first home server in 2004.
>
> there
Quoth Steve Simon :
> was this hard to reproduce?
I've seen it sporadically over the last year, and - when looking for it -
was able to trigger it deliberately yesterday with minimal effort the
first time I looked for it.
...of course, when I was later trying to reproduce it a third time, I
was this hard to reproduce?i have not seen fossil deadlocking and have used it since i installed my first home server in 2004.there definitely _was_ a problem in the snapshot code which was finally resolved around 2015 (roughly), i think perhaps skip, or forsyth found it - i apologise if i have
17 matches
Mail list logo
