Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

2015-10-19 Thread Charles Forsyth
On 18 October 2015 at 23:43, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > BAM! I run straight into RUDP. "Designed at Bell Labs for the Plan 9 > operating system". I just skimmed through the (expired) IETF draft from > 1999 and I honestly think the design might be too much. It looks like > it's

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

2015-10-19 Thread hiro
Do I understand correctly, you just want to avoid having to implement the complexities of TCP on an fpga? If there was a TCP IP core would you buy it? Why does VNC require an fpga, are you going to transfer enormous resolutions? If yes then I personally would use UDP and a lossy and loss tolerant

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

2015-10-19 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:28:13 +0200 >hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Do I understand correctly, you just want to avoid having to implement > the complexities of TCP on an fpga? If there was a TCP IP core would > you buy it? > Why does VNC require

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

2015-10-19 Thread Charles Forsyth
On 19 October 2015 at 20:31, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > I seem to remember IL being more complex than just a UDP with counters > and ACK, which is what I'm - sort of - looking for. > I think you might find Plan 9's rudp is essentially that. Conversations are determined by a

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

2015-10-19 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:36:55 +0200 >Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7738449.html (no Google allowed) > > I only read the abstract and found "pathstar" mentioned in references. > - From a Bell Labs

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

2015-10-19 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:31:43 +0200 >Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > >On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:15:13 -0700 > >Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> wrote: > > > > > Anyone know of a

[9fans] dp9ik draft

2015-10-19 Thread cinap_lenrek
requesting comments and questions. later versions of this draft may be found under: http://felloff.net/usr/cinap_lenrel/newticket.txt Abstract: The goal of this crypto scheme is to replace DES in the Plan 9 authentication and to augment the authentication server with an authenticated key

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

2015-10-19 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:15:13 -0700 >Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> wrote: > > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw > > one a year ago, but I just can't remember what it was! > > are you looking for Internet Link

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

2015-10-19 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:14:46 +0100 >Charles Forsyth wrote: > > On 18 October 2015 at 23:43, Aleksandar Kuktin > wrote: > > > BAM! I run straight into RUDP. "Designed at Bell Labs for the Plan 9 > >

Re: [9fans] dp9ik draft

2015-10-19 Thread cinap_lenrek
sorry, typoed the url: http://felloff.net/usr/cinap_lenrek/newticket.txt -- cinap

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

2015-10-19 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:59:44 -0700 >erik quanstrom wrote: > > On Sun Oct 18 16:16:59 PDT 2015, 9...@9netics.com wrote: > > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw > > > one a year ago, but I just

Re: [9fans] dp9ik draft

2015-10-19 Thread cinap_lenrek
Robert Ransom pointed out offlist that the pak crypto is flawed in this draft so its back to the drawing board. please consider this version of the draft retracted :-) > If an attacker can find scalars s1 and s2 such that s1*H(p1) = > s2*H(p2), then he can send s1*H(p1) as his public key, receive