Re: [9fans] So, why Plan 9?

On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:45:02 +, Bruce Ellis wrote: Very succinct, and better than I could do 'til the coffee kicks in. You could have pointed out that the entire source tree is smaller than the gcc manual. WAT!?! Ahem.. pardon my manners please, but this caught me completely of guard.

Re: [9fans] So, why Plan 9?

On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:27:45 +, Steve Simon wrote: Is there already an implemented.. POSIX compatibility layer, library, or something? Hopefully, something that is very, very thin?? http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/ape.pdf this will allow you to recompile nice clean ansi posix code.

[9fans] Cross-compiling Plan 9

Hello list! Are there any pointers or short instructions or a HOWTO or something similar on the art of cross-compiling Plan 9 from Linux? I've recently decided to start using Plan 9 and, because I am a fucking lunatic, I've decided to download the source code (from plan9.bell-labs.com) and

Re: [9fans] Cross-compiling Plan 9

On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 02:10:37 +0200 Aleksandar Kuktin akuk...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 17:41:35 + Yoann Padioleau p...@fb.com wrote: Hi, I was able to cross compile Plan9 from MacOS which is probably quite similar to cross compiling from Linux. The first thing

Re: [9fans] My 9pi box

On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 14:27:02 +0900 kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote: I forgot it to attach. Kenji I like this. Question: does the box drive the screen? If so, what did you use to connect the screen to it? HDMA? USB maybe? :) I've been on the lookout for USB screens for a while, in order to

Re: [9fans] My 9pi box

On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 08:35:37 +0900 kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote: Question: does the box drive the screen? If so, what did you use to connect the screen to it? HDMA? USB maybe? :) It's connected through HDMI with high-vision mode to 20 TV.. TV may not be good for PC programming,

Re: [9fans] My 9pi box

On Sat, 9 Aug 2014 19:31:31 +0200 hiro 23h...@gmail.com wrote: I guess you're not aware the rpi has a hdmi port? Ooops! By bad. I didn't realize I was looking at a Raspberry in disguise. -- Svi moji e-mailovi su kriptografski potpisani. Proverite ih. All of my e-mails are cryptographically

Re: [9fans] The developers of Plan9 think there was no point in coding in binary code three years ago as they did or make the Riga Technical University and University of Latvia?

On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:47:03 -0300 françai s romaper...@gmail.com wrote: What are the programming languages ​​that were used to develop the Plan9? A dialect of C. The source code is in /sys/src. Probably the Riga Technical University and University of Latvia continue teaching coding in

Re: [9fans] Announcing The Virtual Plan 9 Server Cookbook

On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:16:04 -0400 David L. Craig dlc@gmail.com wrote: This is the publication I wished I had had several months ago, so I decided to write it. With hundreds of screen shots and a few choice scripts (the main one based on maht's make_cpuauth contribution to Plan 9), it

Re: [9fans] inquiry about project sponsorship outside GSoC

On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:33:36 -0400 Caleb Malchik cmalc...@gmail.com wrote: Your role as a sponsor would look something like this: fall semester (between now and mid-December) you would help define requirements and a deliverables timeline, and approve design documents. In the spring you would

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 00:43:56 +0200 >Aleksandar Kuktin <akuk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw one a > year ago, but I just can't remember what it was! BTW, the purpo

[9fans] RUDP and/or others

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. So there I was, shopping around for reliable datagram protocols when BAM! I run straight into RUDP. "Designed at Bell Labs for the Plan 9 operating system". I just skimmed through the (expired) IETF draft from 1999 and I honestly think the

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:28:13 +0200 >hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Do I understand correctly, you just want to avoid having to implement > the complexities of TCP on an fpga? If there was a TCP IP core would > you buy it? > Why does VNC require

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:36:55 +0200 >Aleksandar Kuktin <akuk...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7738449.html (no Google allowed) > > I only read the abstract and found "pathstar" mentioned in r

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:31:43 +0200 >Aleksandar Kuktin <akuk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > >On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:15:13 -0700 > >Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9n

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:15:13 -0700 >Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com> wrote: > > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw > > one a year ago, but I just can't remember what it was! > > are you looking for Internet Link

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:14:46 +0100 >Charles Forsyth <charles.fors...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 18 October 2015 at 23:43, Aleksandar Kuktin <akuk...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > BAM! I run straight into RUDP. &

Re: [9fans] RUDP and/or others

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:59:44 -0700 >erik quanstrom wrote: > > On Sun Oct 18 16:16:59 PDT 2015, 9...@9netics.com wrote: > > > Anyone know of a leaner reliable datagram protocol? I know I saw > > > one a year ago, but I just

Re: [9fans] Web Gardens

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:57:16 +1300 >Andrew Simmons wrote: > > As a diversion from the discussion of the existential essence of > Javascript, could I ask the group for a view on the meaning of the > term "Web Garden"? I was just

Re: [9fans] Pre-ANSI C

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:16:49 +0530 >Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote: > > Not really about Plan 9, but I found this blog post and the comments > (there is even a comment from Rob Pike) very interesting and thought > of sharing

[9fans] Old sources

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does anyone know where to find the THIRD edition of Plan 9? I tried reading the book with the source commentary, as suggested here a week or two back, but I have the fourth edition. The difference in code is sufficiently large that I can't follow the

Re: [9fans] Old sources

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 12:49:54 +0200 >David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Does anyone know where to find the THIRD edition of Plan 9? I tried > > reading the book with the source commentary, as suggested here a > > week or two back, but

Re: [9fans] VoCore SoC?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >On Thu, 03 Nov 2016 23:24:27 + >"James A. Robinson" wrote: > > This looks like it might be of interest to others on the list: > > http://vocore.io/ > > Jim It is of interest, yes. :) - -- Svi moji e-mailovi su

Re: [9fans] The Case for Bind

>On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 14:58:02 + >Marshall Conover wrote: > I have two scenarios currently I feel make a strong argument for the > inclusion of bind: one is running tests on an install of a product > while still being able to do development on it, by using a bind to >

Re: [9fans] UARTing into RPi 2

>On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 09:45:00 +0100 >Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote: > > Add to the end of the command line in cmdline.txt: > console='0 b115200' > and you should see a shell prompt on the serial port when you reboot. >On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:45:51 +0200 >"David du Colombier"

Re: [9fans] Article: Modern storage is plenty fast. It is the APIs that are bad.

On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 08:38:14 -0500 Robert Sherwood wrote: > This is a very interesting article. I'm not enough of an expert on low > level device access APIs to judge its accuracy, but I thought some of > you might find it interesting. > >

Re: [9fans] dd(1) takes very long

>On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:24:15 +0100 >Marco Feichtinger wrote: > > The mirrored disks are 480GB ssds. > > The copying with dd(1) took ~16 hours. > Is that normal? > > -marco Hi, a long-time lurker here. If 480 GiB are transferred over 16 hours, the implied transfer rate is 70 Mbps. If 480 GB

Re: [9fans] dd(1) takes very long

>On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:08:25 +0100 >Marco Feichtinger wrote: > > > and the computer isn't a SBC bitty box, the transfer rate is weirdly > > low. > > Well, both disk are on the same machine. > It's a Supermicro X7SPA-H-D525 board. > > -marco Well, that's not a bitty box. Wish I bought something

Re: Clarifying Lucio's Additional Requests [Was: Re: [9fans] List of companies that use Plan 9. ]

>On Wed, 15 May 2024 10:38:53 +0200 (GMT+02:00) >sirjofri wrote: > > Hey vic, > > There are a few different issues I see with your mails: > Last, we're not a company. People who do the work are the ones > organizing. Those people don't like to see strangers organizing their > stuff without any