On 2015-06-27T22:24:50+0200, Nils M Holm wrote:
On 2015-06-27T11:54:58+0200, David du Colombier wrote:
I'm using version 0.12, from here: https://swtch.com/9vx/
This is a pretty old version (2009), which have known issues.
Later, Yiyus and Ron Minnich made a lot of improvements.
I
What version of 9vx are you using?
I'm using version 0.12, from here: https://swtch.com/9vx/
This is a pretty old version (2009), which have known issues.
Later, Yiyus and Ron Minnich made a lot of improvements.
I would recommend you to use this repository:
https://github.com/0intro/vx32
--
On 2015-06-26T12:00:36+0200, David du Colombier wrote:
This was my first choice but, unfortunately, 9vx crashes on my machine
as soon as I try to do something interesting, e.g. compile a program
with 8c.
What version of 9vx are you using?
I'm using version 0.12, from here:
On 2015-06-27T11:54:58+0200, David du Colombier wrote:
I'm using version 0.12, from here: https://swtch.com/9vx/
This is a pretty old version (2009), which have known issues.
Later, Yiyus and Ron Minnich made a lot of improvements.
I would recommend you to use this repository:
On 2015-06-26T10:22:14+0200, Nils M Holm wrote:
Looks like ftpfs and ftpd cannot agree on a port for passive mode:
Of course, here's the problem:
PASV
227 Entering passive mode (127,0,0,1,212,96)
^
passive mode connect to /net/tcp!127.0.0.1!54368 failed:
On 2015-06-25T13:16:53-0700, Bakul Shah wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:51:49 +0200 Nils M Holm n...@t3x.org wrote:
My guess is ftpfs requires active
mode connection (but should be easy to change).
Looking at the ftpfs sources, I see that it should do passive
mode fine. You should debug!
Admittedly not exactly the same thing, but still: 9vx works very well
on FreeBSD,
and gives immediate access to the host's files.
Mark.
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:29:29 +0200 Nils M Holm n...@t3x.org wrote:
On 2015-06-26T10:22:14+0200, Nils M Holm wrote:
Looks like ftpfs and ftpd cannot agree on a port for passive mode:
Of course, here's the problem:
PASV
227 Entering passive mode (127,0,0,1,212,96)
thanks, to Charles , u9fs is still always an option for me.
On Jun 26, 2015 11:43 AM, Nils M Holm n...@t3x.org wrote:
On 2015-06-26T01:52:25-0700, Bakul Shah wrote:
I just tried this on an old qemu plan9 image. I tried connecting
to the hosts' external address, not 10.0.2.2 and it all
On 2015-06-26T01:52:25-0700, Bakul Shah wrote:
I just tried this on an old qemu plan9 image. I tried connecting
to the hosts' external address, not 10.0.2.2 and it all worked.
Works. Didn't know that was possible. Thanks!
--
Nils M Holm n m h @ t 3 x . o r g www.t3x.org
This was my first choice but, unfortunately, 9vx crashes on my machine
as soon as I try to do something interesting, e.g. compile a program
with 8c.
What version of 9vx are you using?
--
David du Colombier
On 2015-06-25T19:25:36+0200, Nils M Holm wrote:
When logging in via ftpfs, though, I get an empty /n/ftp directory.
Turns out that ftpd on FreeBSD announces a port on localhost for
passive mode connections:
227 Entering Passive Mode (127,0,0,1,247,55)
If I understand QEMU user networking
On 2015-06-26T10:24:45+0200, Mark van Atten wrote:
Admittedly not exactly the same thing, but still: 9vx works very well
on FreeBSD,
and gives immediate access to the host's files.
This was my first choice but, unfortunately, 9vx crashes on my machine
as soon as I try to do something
On 2015-06-25T13:16:53-0700, Bakul Shah wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:51:49 +0200 Nils M Holm n...@t3x.org wrote:
My guess is ftpfs requires active
mode connection (but should be easy to change).
Looking at the ftpfs sources, I see that it should do passive
mode fine. You should debug!
On 2015-06-25T13:09:00-0500, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
FYI, for what it's worth, I usually use SSH to sync files between
my Linux laptop and my Plan 9 VM.
Thanks for the suggestion! Care to give me a short introduction to
ssh on Plan 9? I normally avoid ssh like the plague, so I assume I
know
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:51:49 +0200 Nils M Holm n...@t3x.org wrote:
My guess is ftpfs requires active
mode connection (but should be easy to change).
Looking at the ftpfs sources, I see that it should do passive
mode fine. You should debug!
On 2015-06-25T11:28:12-0700, Bakul Shah wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 19:25:36 +0200 Nils M Holm n...@t3x.org wrote:
Came back to Plan 9 recently, and I'm running into some trouble.
I'm running Plan 9 on QEMU and wanted to use ftpfs to exchange
data with my FreeBSD system.
When logging
Hello everybody!
Came back to Plan 9 recently, and I'm running into some trouble.
I'm running Plan 9 on QEMU and wanted to use ftpfs to exchange
data with my FreeBSD system.
When logging in via ftpfs, though, I get an empty /n/ftp directory.
This is how far I got:
My FreeBSD machine runs
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 19:25:36 +0200 Nils M Holm n...@t3x.org wrote:
Came back to Plan 9 recently, and I'm running into some trouble.
I'm running Plan 9 on QEMU and wanted to use ftpfs to exchange
data with my FreeBSD system.
When logging in via ftpfs, though, I get an empty /n/ftp
FYI, for what it's worth, I usually use SSH to sync files between my Linux
laptop and my Plan 9 VM.
Also, last time I tried, VirtualBox was a bit faster in emulating Plan 9 than
QEMU, especially without KVM.
On June 25, 2015 12:25:36 PM CDT, Nils M Holm n...@t3x.org wrote:
Hello everybody!
ftpfs works fine for me.
I tried it against
ftp.sunet.se,
username=anaonymous,
password=your-email-a...@domain.dom
and /n/ftp contains stuff.
Its worth realising ftpfs gets its directory listing by parsing the output
of the ls command in the ftp protocol, so it has
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Nils M Holm n...@t3x.org wrote:
On 2015-06-25T13:09:00-0500, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
FYI, for what it's worth, I usually use SSH to sync files between
my Linux laptop and my Plan 9 VM.
Thanks for the suggestion! Care to give me a short introduction to
ssh on
22 matches
Mail list logo
