on content-sniffing. I assume Abaco either does the same or allows the
HTML to override the HTTP. Based on previous experience I expect Safari
also gets it right.
abaco gets it right on accident. webfs isn't capable of dealing
with the http charset so it's simply ignored. this causes a
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:05:06 -0700
David Leimbach leim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:44 AM, erik quanstrom
quans...@labs.coraid.comwrote:
i haven't seen any evidence that strongly typed files are a good idea.
but maybe
others have?
I can tell you that the Big Data
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:00:37 -0400
erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
regardless of what one thinks of the standard, the header charset
takes precidence! see
http://www.webstandards.org/learn/articles/askw3c/dec2002/
it sucks, but it's better to follow standards than to invent one's
How much more so then should we oppose
standards which benefit nobody while requiring a lot of work to no
purpose?
You're getting lost. The MIME standard (RFC 1341, June 1992) is what
you started criticising and you're overlooking (a) that a phenomenal
amount of effort went into establishing
Regardless of how unjust a law is, it must be obeyed, for it is the
Law! Right? Hah! I'm one of those people who believe citizens have a
duty to oppose unjust laws. How much more so then should we oppose
standards which benefit nobody while requiring a lot of work to no
purpose?
standards
standards aren't laws. there's no moral component at all.
Politics (insufficient resources) can put moral components into
anything. But most technical standard organisations do aim to avoid
making the type of short sighted judgements that lead to resource
depletion. Then the market comes
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 04:29:15PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
(a) that a phenomenal
amount of effort went into establishing that standard;
Then it belongs on someone's refrigerator, next to a participation
award. Bad decisions aren't less bad just because a lot of people
worked hard to make
Are you claiming it is good through tenure, which is obviously a
fallacy, or are you actually calling this catastrophe of a standard
great?
You're not offering a comparison, so, yes, I'm calling it good. So,
apparently, do innumerable users, again, maybe for want of a better
product. Twenty
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 16:29:15 +0200
Lucio De Re lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
How much more so then should we oppose
standards which benefit nobody while requiring a lot of work to no
purpose?
You're getting lost. The MIME standard (RFC 1341, June 1992) is what
you started criticising
MIME is a shitty workaround (badly) designed to cram non-text data into
a text-based protocol. Instead of using proper transfer protocols to
transfer files, some morons decided to shove binary data into text-based
messaging. When the web crowd decided they, too, would like to shove
unlikely
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 16:51:37 +0200
Lucio De Re lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
standards aren't laws. there's no moral component at all.
Politics (insufficient resources) can put moral components into
anything. But most technical standard organisations do aim to avoid
making the type of short
Kurt H Maier: Are you claiming it is good through tenure, which is
obviously a fallacy, or are you actually calling this catastrophe of a
standard great?
Lucio De Re: You're not offering a comparison, so, yes, I'm calling
it good. So, apparently, do innumerable users, again, maybe for
want of a
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:53:42PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
And you see no contradiction that the seemingly obvious alternatives
just simply haven't gained any ground at all?
Since you seem to be the sort of idiot who can't differentiate technical
quality from distribution volume, I'll
On Sat Jun 9 12:32:20 EDT 2012, kh...@intma.in wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:53:42PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
And you see no contradiction that the seemingly obvious alternatives
just simply haven't gained any ground at all?
Since you seem to be the sort of idiot who can't
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 12:52:17 -0400
erik quanstrom quans...@quanstro.net wrote:
On Sat Jun 9 12:32:20 EDT 2012, kh...@intma.in wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 05:53:42PM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote:
And you see no contradiction that the seemingly obvious alternatives
just simply haven't
I respect all you guy's senseless babbling as I'm being a lot more
disrespectful than anyone here (currently installing windows 98). Go
on.
On Jun 9, 2012 2:11 PM, hiro 23h...@googlemail.com wrote:
I respect all you guy's senseless babbling as I'm being a lot more
disrespectful than anyone here (currently installing windows 98). Go
on.
I would shit on you for this, but I'm an OpenVMS user.
--
Veety
Hey guys,
I'm unable to cpu into my cpu server with every user except bootes, but
drawterm is working perfectly fine. When I try to cpu
in as any other user cpu spits out this line:
cpu: can't authenticate: 192.168.1.25: auth_proxy rpc write: bootes:
connection refused
What's really
18 matches
Mail list logo
