Agreed, but is there a FORTRAN compiler/cross-compiler for Plan 9?
f2c (from netlib) is trivial to get running. This gives you Fortran 77.
It has been sufficient for my needs (spice, zork, some grib stuff).
--lyndon
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 20:32:41 +, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
I remember someone on here mentioning having a translator that
could produce plan 9 executables from output from XLC or XLF as part
of the Blue Gene stuff... don't remember the exact details, but that
sounds like a very worthy piece of
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Benjamin Huntsman
bhunts...@mail2.cu-portland.edu wrote:
Agreed, but is there a FORTRAN compiler/cross-compiler for Plan 9?
I remember someone on here mentioning having a translator that could
produce plan 9 executables from output from XLC or XLF as part of
unless your memory confused that with the fact that I can run Blue
Gene binaries produced by XLC/XLF, I don't recall what you mean ...
ron
Haha, yes, that's it. My memory indeed got confused. Sorry for the noise!
On Sat, 5 Feb 2011 23:12:33 +, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
unless your memory confused that with the fact that I can run Blue
Gene binaries produced by XLC/XLF, I don't recall what you mean ...
Haha, yes, that's it. My memory indeed got confused. Sorry for the
noise!
:-(
I don't write in fortran, but I certainly link to libraries written
in it. It is a truly awful language in any of its incarnations, but
sometimes the library you need is in fortran. Fortunately it's
not to hard to link to from C once you understand its calling
conventions and array ordering.
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:08:38 +, John Stalker wrote:
I don't write in fortran, but I certainly link to libraries written
in it. It is a truly awful language in any of its incarnations, but
sometimes the library you need is in fortran. Fortunately it's
not to hard to link to from C once you
