Re: [abcusers] Sharps 'n flats

2001-12-11 Thread Erik Ronström
> I'd imagine that this could make the music difficult to read at > times. You'd have to stop, backup, and add up the accidentals to > figure out how to play a note. In a measure with many accidentals, > the capacity of a mere human's short-term memory could be easily > overflow

Re: [abcusers] Sharps 'n flats

2001-12-08 Thread Frank Nordberg
John Chambers wrote: > > Just out of curiosity, are there any musical traditions/styles that > use a relative (or cumulative) approach? Actually yes. That's how it was done untill way into the 17th Century. > > I'd imagine that this could make the music difficult to read at > time

RE: [abcusers] Sharps 'n flats

2001-12-08 Thread Eric Galluzzo
They are absolute. Thus, no matter what key you are in, "_e" means E flat. - Eric > -Original Message- > From: Erik Ronström [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > What the accidentals =, ^, _ mean? Are they "absolute" (e g "_e" means > "e flat") or are they in relation to the key (e g "=e"

Re: [abcusers] Sharps 'n flats

2001-12-07 Thread John Chambers
| > Just out of curiosity, are there any musical traditions/styles that | > use a relative (or cumulative) approach? I've never seen any, but | > that doesn't mean they don't exist. | | It's quite common in early music for a sharp-turned-45-degrees sign to | mean either a sharp or a naturali

Re: [abcusers] Sharps 'n flats

2001-12-07 Thread Jack Campin
>|| What the accidentals =3D, ^, _ mean? Are they "absolute" (e g "_e" means >|| "e flat") or are they in relation to the key (e g "=3De" means "e flat" >|| in Bb major)? >| They're absolute, just as in conventional music notation. > Just out of curiosity, are there any musical traditions/styles

Re: [abcusers] Sharps 'n flats

2001-12-07 Thread John Chambers
| Erik Ronstr=F6m writes: | | What the accidentals =3D, ^, _ mean? Are they "absolute" (e g "_e" means | | "e flat") or are they in relation to the key (e g "=3De" means "e flat" | | in Bb major)? | | They're absolute, just as in conventional music notation. Just out of curiosity, are there any m

Re: [abcusers] Sharps 'n flats

2001-12-07 Thread John Chambers
Erik Ronstr=F6m writes: | What the accidentals =3D, ^, _ mean? Are they "absolute" (e g "_e" means | "e flat") or are they in relation to the key (e g "=3De" means "e flat" | in Bb major)? They're absolute, just as in conventional music notation. To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to:

Re: [abcusers] Sharps 'n flats

2001-12-07 Thread Phil Taylor
>What the accidentals =, ^, _ mean? Are they "absolute" (e g "_e" means >"e flat") or are they in relation to the key (e g "=e" means "e flat" >in Bb major)? Accidentals in abc work exactly in the same way as in modern staff notation, that is "_e" means "e flat", even if the e was sharp or flat a

Re: [abcusers] Sharps 'n flats

2001-12-07 Thread James Allwright
On Fri 07 Dec 2001 at 11:57AM +, Erik Ronström wrote: > What the accidentals =, ^, _ mean? Are they "absolute" (e g "_e" means > "e flat") or are they in relation to the key (e g "=e" means "e flat" > in Bb major)? Accidentals are absolute, which is how they are in standard stave notation. J

[abcusers] Sharps 'n flats

2001-12-07 Thread Erik Ronström
What the accidentals =, ^, _ mean? Are they "absolute" (e g "_e" means "e flat") or are they in relation to the key (e g "=e" means "e flat" in Bb major)? Erik Ronström Nokia 5510 looks weird sounds great. Go to http://uk.promotio