On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 10:30:31 +, joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
But please when doing 1st and 2nd repeats, it screws up the bar numbering. [1 might
be bar 8,
[2 will be numbered 9. But I want them both numbered 8 ! Otherwise the following
bars are
numbered incorrectly.
There
Jef Moine writes:
| On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 10:30:31 +, joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| [snip]
| But please when doing 1st and 2nd repeats, it screws up the bar numbering. [1
|might be bar 8,
| [2 will be numbered 9. But I want them both numbered 8 ! Otherwise the following
|bars are
|
Jef Moine writes:
| On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 10:30:31 +, joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| [snip]
| But please when doing 1st and 2nd repeats, it screws up the bar numbering. [1
|might be bar 8,
| [2 will be numbered 9. But I want them both numbered 8 ! Otherwise the following
|bars are
|
Is this incorrect? They're 2 different bars, if I were reading the music I'd expect
them to have different numbers, if they're numbered at all.
Maybe I'm missing the point? What you describe is how iabc does it.
But please when doing 1st and 2nd repeats, it screws up the bar numbering. [1
abc is super. Thanks a lot to everyone.
I am using abcm2ps on a Caldera Linux box. Works great.
But please when doing 1st and 2nd repeats, it screws up the bar numbering. [1 might
be bar 8,
[2 will be numbered 9. But I want them both numbered 8 ! Otherwise the following
bars are
numbered
John Chambers wrote -
There's no way any of you can stop me from using my own code.
Wouldn't dream of it old chap. We seem to have completely different ideas of
what a standard means. You seem to think it's to stop people doing things.
I think it's to enable people to do things. More
Bryan Creer writes:
| John Chambers wrote -
| There's no way any of you can stop me from using my own code.
|
| Wouldn't dream of it old chap. We seem to have completely different ideas of
| what a standard means. You seem to think it's to stop people doing things.
| I think it's to enable
John,
As a software developer in the electronic design automation (EDA) industry,
with way more experience with standards definition and application than I
ever wanted to have, I appreciate all concerns that have been voiced on this
list about standardization. At the same time, the great thing
Hello,
concerning repeats, will it be possible into the new abc standard
to have more than two repeats in a song ? And how about repeats
like |: blabla '-1.3 blabla :| '-2 blabla :| '- 4 etc... || ?
I propose to have something like
X:1
T:Valse à Manu
R:Valse
C:Manuel Murcia
H:
N:
Forgeot Eric wrote:
concerning repeats, will it be possible into the new abc standard
to have more than two repeats in a song ? And how about repeats
like |: blabla '-1.3 blabla :| '-2 blabla :| '- 4 etc... || ?
Yes, it's been proposed several times, and I think quite a lot of people
would
Phil Taylor writes:
| Forgeot Eric wrote:
|
| concerning repeats, will it be possible into the new abc standard
| to have more than two repeats in a song ? And how about repeats
| like |: blabla '-1.3 blabla :| '-2 blabla :| '- 4 etc... || ?
|
| Yes, it's been proposed several times, and I
James Allwright wrights:
| On Mon 15 Apr 2002 at 11:01PM +0200, Forgeot Eric wrote:
| P:[B]
| |: b2 a | aba |1-3 c'2b | bc'b :|2-4 e'2d' | e'd'd' :|
| P:[C]
|
| I usually take X-Y to mean all numbers between X and Y, so the
| above notation looks as if the 2nd and 3rd endings each have
| a
Forgeot Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| concerning repeats, will it be possible into the new abc standard
| to have more than two repeats in a song ? And how about repeats
| like |: blabla '-1.3 blabla :| '-2 blabla :| '- 4 etc... || ?
|
| I propose to have something like
|
| X:1
| T:Valse à
13 matches
Mail list logo
