Hi, Joanie.
As I understand it, "node parent of" / "node child of" are inverse
relations, used to reflect the hierarchy when it is mismatched with the
accessible tree, for example, for flat trees or aria-owns in certain
implementations as you pointed it out.
"member of" is an abstract relation, u
Hey all.
Both ATK/AT-SPI2 and IA2 have "member of" and "node parent of"
accessible relation types. I'm wondering if both are needed.
If memory serves me, "node parent of" was added as an after-the-fact
inverse relation type for the "node child of" relation type. It's used
in Gtk+ for trees and ta
