I am also agree with Aditi's views. I think, AICB is working on this point.
On 6/13/14, Asudani, Rajesh rajeshasud...@rbi.org.in wrote:
What is this?
Have they gone mad?
A scribe to take the test/examination on behalf of a Visually Impaired
(VI) candidate...
GUIDELINES REGARDING
One simple question...
Why is a visually impaired candidate not given an opportunity to give
his/her exam independently by making the online test accessible and
replacing the visual questions with a set of verbal ones.
Is technology not supportive enough or are we fighting the battle in
the
simple, awareness not yet have been brought to SBI management. else,
they will be the first employer to introduce screen readers in bank
exams and stop scribe method. infact, they are the people, who put
very strict rules on scribes so we have gone to court. before that,
computer literacy should
I fully support Aditi's point!
Thanks,
Ajay
On 6/16/14, Aravind R aravind.andhrab...@gmail.com wrote:
simple, awareness not yet have been brought to SBI management. else,
they will be the first employer to introduce screen readers in bank
exams and stop scribe method. infact, they are the
This is a very interesting discussion. If the test is with a screen
reader, will we be able to do all the calculations while attempting
the arithmetic
questions? I think the scribe will do the simple calculations which
are required to solve some problems. Say for example,
25 multiplied by 46?
What is this?
Have they gone mad?
A scribe to take the test/examination on behalf of a Visually Impaired
(VI) candidate...
GUIDELINES REGARDING PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
A scribe to take the test/examination on behalf of a Visually Impaired (VI)
candidate and an
OrthopaedicallyChallenged
Outrageous! Who has drafted it?
This amply spells out what SBI believes in. They actually believe that it
is the scribe who is writing on behalf of the Visually or orthopedically
impaired person and not under the instructions of.
What an understanding! No wonder, they don't believe in the
Please, these guidelines have been passed by the CCPD and not SBI, and
SBI has only implemented the same. And if you're trying to say that
these guidelines are not good, then let me ask you, were the earlier
guidelines better for you, which imposed tens of conditions, like
arranging own scribe who
Dear Rashmi
You understood Subhash sir completely contrary what he aimed to
convey. Just think again SBI has questioned the ability and capability
of blind aspirants you know how? read this A scribe to take the test
on behalf of visually impaired now think what it indicates to a
reader who is
Making use of term On the behalf of does not mean that scribe will
give the examination on his own merits, but implies that that scribe
will attempt according to the instruction of examinee. One need to
look the document in it's entirety and not just few words. They are
based on CCPD guidelines
May be it is a word eror. They meant a scribe for the visually
challenged. Please someone bring this under the authority's concern.
regards
On 6/13/14, Arjun Malhotra malhotraarjun2...@gmail.com wrote:
Making use of term On the behalf of does not mean that scribe will
give the examination on
11 matches
Mail list logo
