Hello ACE,
I've had a side-meeting with Ben at IETF 106 and we clarified the
outstanding issues as follows. I have submitted -26 implementing the
resolutions resulting from these clarifications. See below for detailed
comments.
/Ludwig
On 17/11/2019 07:25, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed,
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Authentication and Authorization for
Constrained Environments WG of the IETF.
Title : Authentication and Authorization for Constrained
Environments (ACE) using
Hi,
I support the adoption of this document and confirm to review future
versions.
Pub-sub is a relevant group communication setting, and it does need to
have both client authorization and secure content exchange ensured.
I believe that this document proposes a good way to address both points.
Hi Peter!
Thanks for your comment. We will definitely go back to try to shorten and
remove duplicate text even more, I agree with you that we could do better there.
I might come back with questions on more precise advice once we give it another
try.
Thanks!
Francesca
From: Ace on behalf of
For those people who were on Jabber yesterday during the meeting, I made a
characterization of Francesca's Pub-Sub draft which was wrong, and she did
not tell me I was an idiot like she should have.
When you are doing encrypted pub-sub there are three problems that need to
be addressed:
1. Get
This is just going to be a high level review on how things are done rather
than a detailed review on each line of text.
1. - Go and read that CoRE Pub-Sub update document - you know the one that
Klaus and friends have not managed to get written since the model proposal
was done way back when.
2.
The ACE WG has placed draft-palombini-ace-coap-pubsub-profile in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Jim Schaad)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palombini-ace-coap-pubsub-profile/
___
Ace mailing list
Hi Authors,
Having read the document and comparing it with ace-key-groupcomm, I have
to agree with Jim that this document repeats in "other" words the same
subjects as specified in ace-key-groupcomm.
In this form, it is very difficult to find out the differences between
the two documents.
It
Dear working group,
As mentioned during the ACE meeting, this mail starts a call for adoption
for draft-palombini-ace-coap-pubsub-profile. Please provide your feed backs
by December 4.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-palombini-ace-coap-pubsub-profile/
Yours,
Daniel
