On 2020-05-05, at 06:54, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
> I have much the same problem. While a client could find an AS which would
> authenticate the client, I don't know how the client would establish any
> degree of trust in the AS which is going to give it tokens.
Hence the four-corner model [1].
I have much the same problem. While a client could find an AS which would
authenticate the client, I don't know how the client would establish any
degree of trust in the AS which is going to give it tokens. If you have
already put a local public key for the AS into the client, then you might as
Hi,
The IETF Executive Director and leadership need community input on how to
handle virtual meetings. Please feel free to complete the survey.
Thanks,
Daniel
-- Forwarded message -
From: IETF Executive Director
Date: Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:04 AM
Subject: Reminder: Survey on
Dear CoRE and ACE,
Apologies for cross-posting, this concerns the security for CoAP group
communications (which is a CoRE draft) and the current specified method to
retrieve public keys for group communication (which is an ACE draft).
When a node joins a group [0] there is a need for group
Hi Laurence, and all,
Thanks for providing a taxonomy. As mentioned, type 0 is clearly in the current
draft COSE charter, and we see also the need for a representation of the X.509
profile in RFC 7925 which relieves constrained devices from implementing
DER/ASN.1 encoding as well as
Peter,
Why not document what you invent in a draft? To me it would be a good starting
point.
/Ludwig
From: Peter van der Stok
Sent: den 4 maj 2020 09:15
To: Carsten Bormann
Cc: Seitz Ludwig ; Jim Schaad
; peter van der Stok ; Ace
Subject: Re: [Ace] draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz
Hi Carsten,
Hi Peter,
Peter van der Stok writes:
> When I want to access an OCF device I can find its IP address through
> service discovery (rfc7252 section 7) using an rt-value registered at
> the IANA core parameters registry. For example, when I want to
> initialize the AS I have to type in the IP
Hi Carsten,
The imagination will not have finished its work in 10 yeras time if coap
and the authorization will enjoy the success they merit.
Also I don't see anybody being ready to start such a document the
coming month.
Do you see another document in which a first set of these registrations
On 2020-05-04, at 08:42, Seitz Ludwig wrote:
>
> For the sake of getting the document finished before I die of old age ;-)
> would it be possible to specify this in a separate document?
I think there may be multiple of these RT registrations, because the fact that
a resource is part of an AS
For the sake of getting the document finished before I die of old age ;-) would
it be possible to specify this in a separate document?
/Ludwig
From: Ace On Behalf Of Peter van der Stok
Sent: den 1 maj 2020 08:56
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: consulta...@vanderstok.org; 'Ace'
Subject: Re: [Ace]
10 matches
Mail list logo