Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-38: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-07-05 Thread Francesca Palombini
Hi Carsten, I like your proposals! I changed a "define" to "specify" to remove some repetition, so finally the text change would be the following: OLD: There may be use cases were different profiles of this framework are combined. For example, an MQTT-TLS profile is used between the

Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-38: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-07-05 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 2021-07-05, at 16:15, Carsten Bormann wrote: > > The last sentence is kind of obvious (I hope that the same applies to > non-combined profiles), but Section 6.7 is short, so a little superfluity > does not hurt. In offline communication, I have been reminded that adding this sentence would

Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-38: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-07-05 Thread Carsten Bormann
Hi Francesca: On 2021-07-05, at 15:32, Francesca Palombini wrote: > > NEW: > There may be use cases were different transport and security protocols Amazingly, this still says “were” where it needs to say “where”, as if the “were” were invisible :-) > are allowed for the different

Re: [Ace] [EXTERNAL] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-ace-oauth-authz-38: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-07-05 Thread Francesca Palombini
Hi all, This is my official "Ok" for that point. Thanks. I still have the following point open from the mail exchange with Ludwig, to which I hadn't replied (all other points are good). CC Cigdem, Carsten and Göran as they participated in the discussion. 6.7. Combining Profiles There may