Sent from Samsung tablet.
Original message From: Ludwig Seitz
Date: 07/01/2020 19:52 (GMT+00:00) To: elwynd ,
gen-...@ietf.org Cc: last-c...@ietf.org,
draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params@ietf.org, ace@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Gen-art]
[Ace] Genart last call review of
draft-ietf-
On 2019-12-22 19:27, elwynd wrote:
Hi, Ludwig.
Having had another look at section 3.1 of
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession, technically the rules about
which keys have to be present are not part of the syntax of the cnf
claim. The point can be covered by changing '"syntax of the 'cnf' clai
From: Ace On Behalf Of Seitz Ludwig
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2019 11:52 PM
To: 'elwynd' ; Ludwig Seitz ; Elwyn
Davies ; gen-...@ietf.org
Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ace] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of
draf
Hello Elwyn,
Sorry for being a pain. I have one more comment.
/Ludwig (now finally from the corporate account)
From: elwynd
Sent: den 22 december 2019 19:27
To: Ludwig Seitz ; Elwyn Davies ;
gen-...@ietf.org
Cc: last-c...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ace-oauth-params@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
Subject
Hi, Ludwig.Having had another look at section 3.1 of
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession, technically the rules about which keys
have to be present are not part of the syntax of the cnf claim. The point can
be covered by changing '"syntax of the 'cnf' claim"to "syntax and semantics of
the '
Hi, Ludwig.Yes, -08 addresses the two points noted below... unfortunately you
didn't fix the various nits and the other minor issues as you indicated you
were intending to in your initial response (EC => EC2, etc).Enjoy the
holidays!Cheers,ElwynSent from Samsung tablet.
Original message
On 2019-12-19 21:23, elwynd wrote:
Hi, Ludwig.
Thanks for the prompt response.
Regarding he major issue, I understand what the intention of the split
was, but as far as early implementations are concerned, there is no such
thing as a 'minimal breakage'; unless there is some cunning mechanism in
Hi, Ludwig.Thanks for the prompt response.Regarding he major issue, I
understand what the intention of the split was, but as far as early
implementations are concerned, there is no such thing as a 'minimal breakage';
unless there is some cunning mechanism in the basic ace-oauth-authz protocol,