n what will happen.
>
> Best regards
> Esko Dijk
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ace On Behalf Of Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 18:56
> To: Jim Schaad ; draft-ietf-ace-coap-...@ietf.org
> Cc: 'ace'
> Subject: Re
Dnote" in the text is not so clear on what will happen.
Best regards
Esko Dijk
-Original Message-
From: Ace On Behalf Of Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 18:56
To: Jim Schaad ; draft-ietf-ace-coap-...@ietf.org
Cc: 'ace'
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review
Behalf Of Jim Schaad
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2018 9:34 AM
To: draft-ietf-ace-coap-...@ietf.org
Cc: 'ace'
Subject: [Ace] Review draft-ietf-ace-coap-est
* In section 4.1 I have a question about what you are using for payload content
encoding. Part of this might just be a question of how y
ubject: RE: [Ace] Review draft-ietf-ace-coap-est
Hi Jim,
Trying to close on this one and update the draft if necessary.
> [JLS] I do not believe that the wrapping of content with the CBOR binary
> text wrapping is needed at this point. If that is needed for the multi-part
> wrapp
...@ietf.org; 'ace'
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review draft-ietf-ace-coap-est
From: Peter van der Stok mailto:stokc...@bbhmail.nl>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 1:53 AM
To: Jim Schaad mailto:i...@augustcellars.com>>
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-coap-...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ace-coa
From: Peter van der Stok
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 1:01 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: consulta...@vanderstok.org; draft-ietf-ace-coap-...@ietf.org; 'ace'
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review draft-ietf-ace-coap-est
* In section 4.1 I have a question about what you are using for paylo
> * In section 4.1 I have a question about what you are using for payload
> content encoding. Part of this might just be a question of how you plan to
> move from ASN.1 to CBOR at some point in the future. I think that it would
> necessitate doing new media-types in that event. You appear to
From: Peter van der Stok
Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 1:53 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-coap-...@ietf.org; 'ace'
Subject: Re: [Ace] Review draft-ietf-ace-coap-est
Hi Jim,
Many thanks for the review. See our answers below.
* In section 4.1 I have a question abou
Hi Jim,
Many thanks for the review. See our answers below.
* In section 4.1 I have a question about what you are using for payload
content encoding. Part of this might just be a question of how you plan
to move from ASN.1 to CBOR at some point in the future. I think that it
would necessitate d
* In section 4.1 I have a question about what you are using for payload
content encoding. Part of this might just be a question of how you plan to
move from ASN.1 to CBOR at some point in the future. I think that it would
necessitate doing new media-types in that event. You appear to be doing a
10 matches
Mail list logo
