Hi,
This email closes the call for adoption. The document as been adopted as WG
document. Please upload the document as an ietf wg document.
Yours,
Daniel
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 9:31 AM Cigdem Sengul
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I support the adoption as well. As Jim said, the MQTT-TLS profile has
>
Hi all,
I support adoption of this document and I am willing to review it.
The approach in ace-key-groupcomm-oscore for joining OSCORE groups is
now using an AIF specific data model, also included in our ACE
implementation for Californium.
I plan to extend the implementation to support the
Hi,
I support adoption of this document, and believe Ace should adopt it. I am
willing to review, but I don't have any implementation plans.
Thanks,
Francesca
On 15/07/2020, 22:52, "Ace on behalf of Jim Schaad" wrote:
I had been holding off doing an adoption call waiting for a formal
On 2020-07-18, at 00:21, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
> Refreshing my memory of the WG charter, it seems like this can be in scope,
> but we should be sure to consider what analogues already exist in
> non-constrained systems, and whether we are in fact creating something
> generally new and broadly
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 01:51:39PM -0700, Jim Schaad wrote:
> I had been holding off doing an adoption call waiting for a formal request
> to adopt it. However, given that this is now a dependency for three
> different WG documents I think we need to do this now.
>
> Adoption call for
>
On 2020-07-15, at 22:51, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
> I had been holding off doing an adoption call waiting for a formal request
> to adopt it.
Sorry about that — I was still thinking we should finish the discussion about
the new dynamic permissions. But I realize now that these have been around
I had been holding off doing an adoption call waiting for a formal request
to adopt it. However, given that this is now a dependency for three
different WG documents I think we need to do this now.
Adoption call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bormann-core-ace-aif/
This document
