possession@ietf.org; ace@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification -
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-07.txt
On 25/09/2019 10:13, Mike Jones wrote:
> Does one of you have the time to create a PR today making the two
> changes? I’ll then be able to review it and
;
ace@ietf.org
*Subject:* Re: New Version Notification -
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-07.txt
+1
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:31 AM Ludwig Seitz <mailto:ludwig.se...@ri.se>> wrote:
On 25/09/2019 02:23, Mike Jones wrote:
> I'm fine with us making both of the prop
-
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-07.txt
+1
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 8:31 AM Ludwig Seitz
mailto:ludwig.se...@ri.se>> wrote:
On 25/09/2019 02:23, Mike Jones wrote:
> I'm fine with us making both of the proposed changes.
>
>
On 25/09/2019 02:23, Mike Jones wrote:
I'm fine with us making both of the proposed changes.
Thanks,
-- Mike
+1
--
Ludwig Seitz, PhD
Security Lab, RISE
Phone +46(0)70-349 92 51
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New Version Notification -
draft-ietf-ace-cwt-proof-of-possession-07.txt
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 04:33:18PM -0700, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the updates; they look good!
>
> Before I kick off the IETF LC, I just have two things I wanted to
>
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 04:33:18PM -0700, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the updates; they look good!
>
> Before I kick off the IETF LC, I just have two things I wanted to
> double-check (we may not need a new rev before the LC):
>
> (1) In Section 3.2 (Representation of an
