TBH, I'm not a fan of SHOULD+, etc., and they're pretty alien to TLS, so
you should just use words if you want to convey these points.
With that said, I don't really understand the objective here: we're
generally moving towards the CFRG curves, so what's the reasoning for the
P256 MUST and why do
Thanks. I have no objection to this draft proceeding as-si
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>
wrote:
> Thanks, Ekr. One more reply to your last comment the bottom of the
> message…
>
>
>
> *From:* Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com>
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:34 PM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>
wrote:
> Hi Ekr. Thanks for the review comments. Responses are inline below,
> prefixed by "Mike>"...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com>
&
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ace-cbor-web-token-13: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
