Re: [Acme] WGLC for ACME DTN Node ID

Russ, Thank you for the review comments. My responses are inline with prefix "[BS1]". > I think that this document is almost ready. I have a few comments. > MAJOR: > Section 4 points to Section 4.4.2 of [I-D.ietf-dtn-tcpclv4]; but that profile > does not require the certificate to include an

Re: [Acme] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-07: (with COMMENT)

Thank you Éric for your review. We will be tracking it here: https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/176 Yaron On 4/8/21, 00:02, "Éric Vyncke via Datatracker" wrote: Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-07: No Objection

Re: [Acme] Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Lars, Thank you for your review. We will be tracking your comments at https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/168 (the Discuss) and https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/169 (all other comments). Yaron On 4/6/21, 15:41, "Lars Eggert via Datatracker" wrote: Lars Eggert has

Re: [Acme] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-06

We have already addressed the GenArt comments, thank you Suresh! I will respond to Lars's review separately. Yaron On 4/6/21, 15:52, "Lars Eggert" wrote: Suresh, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this document based on my own review. Lars

Re: [Acme] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Francesca, Thank you for your review and for getting the CBOR community and Carsten involved. We will be tracking your comments here: https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/173 And Carsten's review of CDDL and JSON Schema here: https://github.com/yaronf/I-D/issues/170 Thanks, Yaron