Re: [Acme] Comments on draft-barnes-acme-service-provider

On 11 July 2017 at 07:29, Mary Barnes wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Thanks for taking the time to review. We're actually working on a revision > right now addressing your comments and agree totally with your point that > more detail is definitely needed in this draft.

Re: [Acme] Consensus -- CAA draft to WGLC?

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 6 July 2017 at 20:07, Hugo Landau wrote: > > Vendor-assigned identifiers could be supported as such: > > vnd:example.com/custom-method > > RFC 6648 explains why vendor-prefixes can be a

Re: [Acme] Comments on draft-barnes-acme-service-provider

Hi Martin, Thanks for taking the time to review. We're actually working on a revision right now addressing your comments and agree totally with your point that more detail is definitely needed in this draft. Since we were still reviewing letter ballot comments on the document at the draft