All,
This latest update of the DTN Node ID Validation draft removes any updates
to the DTN document (and references the new draft that those portions are
now moved into) and makes some more explicit statements about
"multi-perspective validation" including a recommended (not required)
policy that
Just read it. Reasonable thing to specify.
Not sure why this doesn't talk about delegations of the domain and the effect
that might have. That seems relevant. Though control over the parent implies
control over delegations, it might be a consideration when setting policy.
Not sure why
I have read the document, and I think that ACME should adopt it.
Russ
> On Oct 14, 2021, at 8:16 AM, Cooley, Dorothy E
> wrote:
>
> This is the second working group call for adoption of:
> draft-friel-acme-subdomains-05.
> We have had presentations of this work at the most recent interim
>
I support adoption.
___
Acme mailing list
Acme@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
This is the second working group call for adoption of:
draft-friel-acme-subdomains-05.
We have had presentations of this work at the most recent interim
(clarifications presented) and at many of the past IETF meetings.
Please review the draft and post your comments to the list by Thursday, 28
