Re: [Acme] I-D Action: draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-06.txt
All, This latest update of the DTN Node ID Validation draft removes any updates to the DTN document (and references the new draft that those portions are now moved into) and makes some more explicit statements about "multi-perspective validation" including a recommended (not required) policy that agrees with Let's Encrypt implementation experience. I believe that these changes address all comments received to-date and the draft should be ready for any further review. Thanks, Brian S. On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 11:58 PM wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Automated Certificate Management > Environment WG of the IETF. > > Title : Automated Certificate Management Environment > (ACME) Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID Validation Extension > Author : Brian Sipos > Filename: draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-06.txt > Pages : 29 > Date: 2021-10-13 > > Abstract: >This document specifies an extension to the Automated Certificate >Management Environment (ACME) protocol which allows an ACME server to >validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Node ID for an ACME >client. The DTN Node ID is encoded as a certificate Subject >Alternative Name (SAN) of type otherName with a name form of >BundleEID and as an ACME Identifier type "bundleEID". > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-06.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-06 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > ___ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption
Just read it. Reasonable thing to specify. Not sure why this doesn't talk about delegations of the domain and the effect that might have. That seems relevant. Though control over the parent implies control over delegations, it might be a consideration when setting policy. Not sure why "domainNamespace" is used as the field when "subdomains" is shorter and easier to understand. On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, at 23:16, Cooley, Dorothy E wrote: > This is the second working group call for adoption of: > draft-friel-acme-subdomains-05. > We have had presentations of this work at the most recent interim > (clarifications presented) and at many of the past IETF meetings. > > Please review the draft and post your comments to the list by Thursday, 28 > October 2021. > > Thanks, > Deb and Yoav > > > ___ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption
I have read the document, and I think that ACME should adopt it. Russ > On Oct 14, 2021, at 8:16 AM, Cooley, Dorothy E > wrote: > > This is the second working group call for adoption of: > draft-friel-acme-subdomains-05. > We have had presentations of this work at the most recent interim > (clarifications presented) and at many of the past IETF meetings. > > Please review the draft and post your comments to the list by Thursday, 28 > October 2021. > > Thanks, > Deb and Yoav > > > ___ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
Re: [Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption
I support adoption. ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
[Acme] 2nd working group call for adoption
This is the second working group call for adoption of: draft-friel-acme-subdomains-05. We have had presentations of this work at the most recent interim (clarifications presented) and at many of the past IETF meetings. Please review the draft and post your comments to the list by Thursday, 28 October 2021. Thanks, Deb and Yoav ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
