>
> Would it be sensible to move the common list of parameters there as well,
> for parity with how the other object types are described?
I think the forward pointer is probably sufficient.
Richard: What do you think?
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Felipe Gasper
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
Hi Daniel,
It definitely helps, yes. Would it be sensible to move the common list
of parameters there as well, for parity with how the other object types are
described?
-Felipe
> On Mar 2, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Daniel McCarney wrote:
>
> Hi Felipe,
>
> Does this PR from Richard Barnes a
Hi Felipe,
Does this PR from Richard Barnes address your feedback?
https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/399
Thanks!
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Felipe Gasper
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’ve been looking over the -09 draft and have created a Perl
> client module against Pebble as wel
Hello,
I’ve been looking over the -09 draft and have created a Perl client
module against Pebble as well as LE’s new testing endpoint.
I’m curious about whether the specification intends to define Challenge
objects. They appear to exist, of course, but they’re not defined as obj
