Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-client: Was: Basic ACME question/Open Banking

2021-12-29 Thread Anders Rundgren
Hi Kathleen & Co, I have now actually used ACME as well :) Anyway, I see a slight disconnect between ACME and how Open Banking CAs work today. That is, open banking application developers typically create an account using a Web application provided by the bank (or external CA). From this

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-client: Was: Basic ACME question/Open Banking

2021-11-04 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
Hi Anders, On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 2:08 PM Anders Rundgren < anders.rundgren@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2021-10-19 19:00, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > > Hello Anders, > > > > The draft extends ACME to add client challenge methods that might be > helpful. This could be for several use cases

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-client: Was: Basic ACME question/Open Banking

2021-10-19 Thread Anders Rundgren
On 2021-10-19 19:00, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: Hello Anders, The draft extends ACME to add client challenge methods that might be helpful. This could be for several use cases including code signing automation or client certificate management.  Does the draft contain what you need? The use case

Re: [Acme] draft-ietf-acme-client: Was: Basic ACME question/Open Banking

2021-10-19 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
Hello Anders, The draft extends ACME to add client challenge methods that might be helpful. This could be for several use cases including code signing automation or client certificate management. Does the draft contain what you need? The use case from your message is not clear to me. Thank you,

[Acme] draft-ietf-acme-client: Was: Basic ACME question/Open Banking

2021-10-13 Thread Anders Rundgren
After some research I found https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-acme-client/ which almost fills the bill. What would the preferred procedure be, including challenge? Attestations like offered by FIDO is not a part of ACME, right? thanx, Anders On 2021-10-11 9:03, Anders Rundgren