Re: [Acme] -09 draft: Challenge objects?
> > Would it be sensible to move the common list of parameters there as well, > for parity with how the other object types are described? I think the forward pointer is probably sufficient. Richard: What do you think? On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Felipe Gasper wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > It definitely helps, yes. Would it be sensible to move the common > list of parameters there as well, for parity with how the other object > types are described? > > -Felipe > > > On Mar 2, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Daniel McCarney wrote: > > > > Hi Felipe, > > > > Does this PR from Richard Barnes address your feedback? > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/399 > > > > Thanks! > > > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Felipe Gasper > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I’ve been looking over the -09 draft and have created a Perl > client module against Pebble as well as LE’s new testing endpoint. > > > > I’m curious about whether the specification intends to define > Challenge objects. They appear to exist, of course, but they’re not defined > as objects per se in section 7.1 of the draft. > > > > Thank you! > > > > -Felipe Gasper > > Mississauga, ON > > ___ > > Acme mailing list > > Acme@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > > > > ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
Re: [Acme] -09 draft: Challenge objects?
Hi Daniel, It definitely helps, yes. Would it be sensible to move the common list of parameters there as well, for parity with how the other object types are described? -Felipe > On Mar 2, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Daniel McCarney wrote: > > Hi Felipe, > > Does this PR from Richard Barnes address your feedback? > https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/399 > > Thanks! > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Felipe Gasper > wrote: > Hello, > > I’ve been looking over the -09 draft and have created a Perl client > module against Pebble as well as LE’s new testing endpoint. > > I’m curious about whether the specification intends to define > Challenge objects. They appear to exist, of course, but they’re not defined > as objects per se in section 7.1 of the draft. > > Thank you! > > -Felipe Gasper > Mississauga, ON > ___ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
Re: [Acme] -09 draft: Challenge objects?
Hi Felipe, Does this PR from Richard Barnes address your feedback? https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/pull/399 Thanks! On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Felipe Gasper wrote: > Hello, > > I’ve been looking over the -09 draft and have created a Perl > client module against Pebble as well as LE’s new testing endpoint. > > I’m curious about whether the specification intends to define > Challenge objects. They appear to exist, of course, but they’re not defined > as objects per se in section 7.1 of the draft. > > Thank you! > > -Felipe Gasper > Mississauga, ON > ___ > Acme mailing list > Acme@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme > ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
[Acme] -09 draft: Challenge objects?
Hello, I’ve been looking over the -09 draft and have created a Perl client module against Pebble as well as LE’s new testing endpoint. I’m curious about whether the specification intends to define Challenge objects. They appear to exist, of course, but they’re not defined as objects per se in section 7.1 of the draft. Thank you! -Felipe Gasper Mississauga, ON ___ Acme mailing list Acme@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/acme
