http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 00:17 ---
The BIOS indeed doesn't reserve 0x290-0x29f, but it reserves 0x290-0x294, with
no good reason as far as I can see.
This will cause the system to run unstable is another way to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10010
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017#c32
--- Comment #32 from Oskar Eisemuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 02:28:09
MST ---
The Abit AX78 may have the same error, I haven't had yet a chance
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #75 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 01:30 ---
This is a bug in the ACPI interpreter in the kernel - editing the DSDT is only
a workaround until the guys at Intel figure out how this DSDT works on Windows,
and can then
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9915
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 01:46 ---
Will you please try the boot option of pci=nommconf acpi.debug_layer=0x01
acpi.debug_level=0x17 and attach the output? (Use the 2.6.23.1 kernel).
Thanks.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 01:59 ---
Hi, Zygfryd
Will you please upload the full dmesg output?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 03:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=14977)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14977action=view)
dmesg and other logs
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-24 08:15 ---
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have exactly the same problem on Acer Aspire 5720.
Sensors are not updated. In my case sensors are not updated even when i just
start the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-24 16:16 ---
Regressions list annotation:
Handled-By : Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10093
Summary: 2.6.25-current-git hangs on boot
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 03:37 ---
but somebody recommended option: EC_INTR=0
to kernel line in grub and I'm testing it also - so far (lets say half a day)
no errors with this parameter regarding battery and
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 03:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=14978)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14978action=view)
dmesg and other logs - now with battery status unknown
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10056
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 03:31 ---
My laptop's acpidump (T30) is already attached to bug #10047.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 04:52 ---
Please apply this patch, find which acpi_video device backlight sys I/F can
work for you and attach the result of cat
/sys/class/backlight/acpi_videoX/acpi_dev/path.
this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10089
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-24 10:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=14963)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14963action=view)
output of dmidecode on lifebook p7010
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8532
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 16:59 ---
Anyone working on this or not?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 06:48 ---
I expect the problem is:
- The external graphics ACPI device is using the traditional method to switch
brightness, it also works for the internal (Intel) graphics device
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10089
Summary: no sysfs backlight interface on lifebook p7010
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: Any kernel version
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 07:53 ---
ups, even with ec_intr=0 it is not working properly, battery disappearing
again sometimes
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10094
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 08:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=14980)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14980action=view)
/proc/acpi/battery/info (no battery actually inserted)
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10094
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 08:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=14981)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14981action=view)
/proc/acpi/battery/state (no battery at all)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|low |normal
--- Comment #18 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10093
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #62 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 12:03 ---
Tested 2.6.25-rc3 today. It appeared harder to reproduce the problem, I did
s2disk, s2disk, s2disk, and then s2ram. Problems only occurred on resume from
that s2ram. Did not
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
Summary: 208c70a45624400fafd7511b96bc426bf01f8f5e breaks EC init
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 13:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=14986)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14986action=view)
acpidump
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 13:25 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
I finally found that the problematic option is Kernel-user space relay
support. I have build 2.6.25-rc3 with CPU idle enabled and user space relay
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 22:08 ---
zdenek,
please set CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO and modprobe video after system boot.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-24 15:10 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
It may have been a coincidence that the
workqueue was running during a suspend.
I think it is because it does not happen every time.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 21:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=14946)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14946action=view)
debug patch
Please apply this patch and attach the dmesg output.
Then
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14946|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #7 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-23 15:27 ---
To any ACPI experts reading this bug report: Is it truly necessary to register
a new device (acpi_add_single_object) while the system is suspending or
resuming?
Would it be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14964|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 09:37 ---
It looks like this trace precedes the undocking oops. I.e., I can see this
trace and after it, undocking produces the oops mentioned above.
[86836.756886] ACPI: \_SB_.GDCK -
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10071
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
Summary: 2.6.25-rc2 Regression Thinkpad acpi
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc2-git7
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||9832
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 15:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=14991)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14991action=view)
test patch
Please check if this patch helps
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: I cannot boot fedora after updating the kernel on a sony vaio
vgn-fe41z laptop.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432477
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10104
Summary: 2.6.25-rc3: WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:137
Product: Platform Specific/Hardware
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-23 10:36 ---
Gigabyte wrote me:
our bios open only the resource for 0295 to 0296 not 0X290-0x29F.
They cannot open reserve 0X290-0X29, this will cause the system to run
unstable.
According
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-23 13:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=14961)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14961action=view)
Patch removing the locking of devices from the suspend core
Lukas, can you
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #74 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 19:01 ---
One question : does it mean the problem comes from the kernel and it should be
fixed or that I need to do this for each new kernel ?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10093
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 16:28 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
I see the same issue for Aser Aspire 5720G.
P.S. It looks like bug 9167 No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) -
Acer Aspire 5720, 7720Z
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9945
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 06:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=14950)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14950action=view)
dmesg after the patching
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9945
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 22:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=14948)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14948action=view)
debug patch
there is only invalid notify 0x81 for AC on this laptop.
For
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: I cannot boot fedora after updating the kernel on a sony vaio
vgn-fe41z laptop.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432477
--- Additional
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10104
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10104
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 16:18 ---
*** Bug 10072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10042
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 17:23 ---
Hi, Erik
The error log in comment #3 is caused by the broken BIOS.
Method (_BQC, 0, NotSerialized)
{
Return (Index (BTBL, \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC0.BKLG))
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10042
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 17:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=14993)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14993action=view)
try the custom DSDT
Will you please try the custom DSDT ?
How to use the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 17:25 ---
Comment #6 seems to indicate that my transparent bridge sizing patch
is no longer the prime suspect but if I can reproduce the problem
with my T41p I will try to figure out
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10089
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 18:05 ---
Will you please attach the output of dmesg and acpidump?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 19:43 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
I expect the problem is:
- The external graphics ACPI device is using the traditional method to
switch
brightness, it also works for the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 20:18 ---
One has to revert commit 208c70a45624400fafd7511b96bc426bf01f8f5e for testing
if this bug is fixed (until bug 10100 is fixed, that is).
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10010
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 22:00 ---
Thanks for the info.
From the info in comment #18 we can know that sometimes the design capacity is
less than the remaining capacity.
remaining capacity: 3769 mAh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9945
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 22:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=14998)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14998action=view)
dmesg output
Hello,
What Rui said in comment #13 is right. There is no
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 22:47 ---
that is great comment sir :-)
but let me tell you the story: I already changed BIOS maybe 10 times,
on MSI web page
75 matches
Mail list logo