[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #9 from Jacob Kaulike (kaul...@system76.com) --- I've just given that a try and it does fix this issue -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

[Bug 218867] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c:401:12

2024-05-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218867 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@gmx.com ---

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #8 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- This fix was posted, can you please try it? https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/954 -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #59 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Hi Ralph, Thank you for trying the instructions. You can safely ignore the BTF related stuff, don't worry about it :). Do you have any newer kernels pre-built that you can try

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #58 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- Hi Diogo When I try to compile the modules following your instructions, I got Skipping BTF generation for /home/ralph/Downloads/linux-6.9.1/drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi_acpi.ko due to

[Bug 218867] New: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c:401:12

2024-05-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218867 Bug ID: 218867 Summary: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c:401:12 Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux

[Bug 218867] UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/acpi/acpica/dswexec.c:401:12

2024-05-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218867 sander44 (ionut_n2...@yahoo.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Kernel Version||6.1.25 -- You may

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #57 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- Hi Diogo I followed your instructions (I am using the current testing kernel 6.7.12), building the module with the 6.9.1 sources, disabling safe boot, and got insmod: ERROR: could not

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #56 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Created attachment 306315 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306315=edit Fix patch -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #55 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Created attachment 306314 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306314=edit Debug patch -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #54 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Hello, The updated instructions are: - Get the kernel source from kernel.org (v6.9.1) and extract it to a folder. Download both debug.patch and fix.patch as well. - Extract

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #53 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Hi Ralph, I guess the only option is to compile the kernel module from source. I'll place the patches and instructions here soon. Thanks, Diogo -- You may reply to this email

[Bug 218864] HP Envy x360: Graphical corruption over time without amdgpu.sg_display=0 kernel option

2024-05-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218864 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Component|BIOS

[Bug 218864] HP Envy x360: Graphical corruption over time without amdgpu.sg_display=0 kernel option

2024-05-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218864 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 218864] HP Envy x360: Graphical corruption over time without amdgpu.sg_display=0 kernel option

2024-05-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218864 Matthew (ruinairas1...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218864] New: HP Envy x360: Graphical corruption over time without amdgpu.sg_display=0 kernel option

2024-05-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218864 Bug ID: 218864 Summary: HP Envy x360: Graphical corruption over time without amdgpu.sg_display=0 kernel option Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS:

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #52 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- Hi Diogo, any suggestion how I can proceed beyond the error message I reported when trying to install your patched module? Thanks Ralph -- You may reply to this email to add a comment.

[Bug 218853] ACPI: (UEFI?) Oops due to tables memmap wrong after S4 platform resume

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218853 --- Comment #1 from TJ (li...@iam.tj) --- Created attachment 306304 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306304=edit Data and analysis files Archive containing data and analysis files. -- You may reply to this email to add a

[Bug 218853] New: ACPI: (UEFI?) Oops due to tables memmap wrong after S4 platform resume

2024-05-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218853 Bug ID: 218853 Summary: ACPI: (UEFI?) Oops due to tables memmap wrong after S4 platform resume Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: AMD OS: Linux

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #7 from Jacob Kaulike (kaul...@system76.com) --- Created attachment 306301 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306301=edit acpidump for ASRock WRX90 WS EVO Here's an acpidump for the WRX90 WS EVO motherboard from

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #6 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Ah, got it. Thanks for checking. We *might* be best off reverting, but I'd like to see what Rafael and others have to say. -- You may reply to this email to add a

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #5 from Martin Mokrejs (mmokr...@gmail.com) --- Mario, https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/30/128 that was year 2008 and my ASUS L3C/S laptop. I don't have it anymore. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #4 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Jacob, Can you please add an acpidump and kernel log (from a faulty kernel without that revert) -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #3 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- I CC'ed the original reporter, Martin to the bug. Martin - can you revert that on a current kernel and see if your original problem still exists? -- You may reply to

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 --- Comment #2 from Jacob Kaulike (kaul...@system76.com) --- Yes, that is correct. Reverting that commit does fix this issue for us. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the

[Bug 218849] ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218849] New: ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218849 Bug ID: 218849 Summary: ASRock TRX90 WS EVO fails to suspend to S3 Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs

2024-05-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs

2024-05-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #15 from Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) --- Thanks for testing, much appreciated! However, note that the patch you tested has been replaced with: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/6046110.lOV4Wx5bFT@kreacher due to

[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend

2024-05-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 --- Comment #6 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- This looks like it's the EC trying to wake up the system. Case (0x03) { M000 (0x3903) M460 ("

[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend

2024-05-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 --- Comment #5 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306296 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306296=edit dsdt.dsl -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend

2024-05-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 --- Comment #4 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- I did a quick and dirty modification on acpica code to bypass the error and get dsdt.dat decompiled. Hopefully it doesn't distort things significantly. ``` diff --git

[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend

2024-05-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 217950] [Regression] S3 Sleep Mode failures since Linux 6.x on Dell Inspiron 15 5593

2024-05-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217950 --- Comment #11 from The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis) (regressi...@leemhuis.info) --- (In reply to Arnas from comment #10) > I might be able to pull out my old NVMe with Arch for testing, it should > still boot fine.

[Bug 217950] [Regression] S3 Sleep Mode failures since Linux 6.x on Dell Inspiron 15 5593

2024-05-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217950 --- Comment #10 from Arnas (arnasz...@gmail.com) --- Well, I swapped my NVMe, went from Arch+Win10 to Fedora+Win11. Since I was swapping SSDs, I also updated my Windows and swapped to Fedora as main. I might be able to pull out my old NVMe with

[Bug 217950] [Regression] S3 Sleep Mode failures since Linux 6.x on Dell Inspiron 15 5593

2024-05-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217950 --- Comment #9 from The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis) (regressi...@leemhuis.info) --- (In reply to Arnas from comment #7) > So, I do think this is a upstream kernel issue. Anyway, it's summer break - > is there anything

[Bug 217950] [Regression] S3 Sleep Mode failures since Linux 6.x on Dell Inspiron 15 5593

2024-05-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217950 --- Comment #8 from Arnas (arnasz...@gmail.com) --- Same exact issues as well in the log file after closing lid: (Attempt 1, successful sleep): May 14 08:17:30 fediron kernel: ACPI Error: Thread 3438522176 cannot release Mutex [ECMX] acquired by

[Bug 217950] [Regression] S3 Sleep Mode failures since Linux 6.x on Dell Inspiron 15 5593

2024-05-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217950 --- Comment #7 from Arnas (arnasz...@gmail.com) --- Alright, so quick status update, I switched to Fedora Linux 40 since I needed it for a few things, and got rid of my Arch install. Current kernel is 6.8.9-300.fc40.x86_64, and annoyingly

[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend

2024-05-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 --- Comment #2 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- Found this https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221012221028.4817-1-mario.limoncie...@amd.com/T/ Setting gpiolib_acpi.ignore_interrupt=AMDI0030:00@3 fixes the issue. Though I still wonder what GPIO

[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend

2024-05-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Kernel Version||6.8.9 -- You may reply

[Bug 218829] B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend

2024-05-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 --- Comment #1 from CUI Hao (cuihao@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306288 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306288=edit dmesg -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 218829] New: B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend

2024-05-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218829 Bug ID: 218829 Summary: B650M/Ryzen 7700X PC immediately wakes up from "deep" suspend Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: AMD OS: Linux

[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs

2024-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #14 from webcaptcha (webcap...@gmail.com) --- I have added logs with patch included in case you want to take a look. Thanks! -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the

[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs

2024-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #13 from webcaptcha (webcap...@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306286 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306286=edit acpi-with-patch.dump -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this

[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs

2024-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #12 from webcaptcha (webcap...@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306285 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306285=edit dmesq-with-patch-logs -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this

[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs

2024-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #11 from webcaptcha (webcap...@gmail.com) --- Feel free if I need to test something specially -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.

[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs

2024-05-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 --- Comment #10 from webcaptcha (webcap...@gmail.com) --- Hi Rafael J. Wysocki Thank you for joining. Looks like the patch did actually help to fix errors in journalctl. Woohoo! With the help of one guy (@loqs) from the Arch forum I was able

[Bug 218789] ucsi_acpi USBC000:00: ucsi_acpi_dsm: failed to evaluate _DSM 2 in logs

2024-05-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218789 Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) changed: What|Removed |Added Component|USB |EC

[Bug 2148] ACPI: No IRQ known ... - using IRQ 255

2024-05-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2148 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Regression|--- |No -- You may reply

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #51 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- I also tried 6.5 and 6.6 series kernels, with the same outcome. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #50 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- OK, I used mokutil to turn off secure boot, but when I tried to insert the old version of your module I got insmod: ERROR: could not insert module ucsi_acpi_old.ko: Invalid module format

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #49 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- Model 16Z90Q-K.AD78A1 Unfortunately, I get the below trying to unload then insert your (old) module: rmmod: ERROR: Module ucsi_acpi is not currently loaded insmod: ERROR: could not

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #48 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Ok, I have submitted two versions of the kernel module: ucsi_acpi_old.ko and ucsi_acpi_fix.ko. Both of them print debug messages to dmesg. Important: These should only fix the

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #47 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Created attachment 306278 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306278=edit Fixed ucsi_acpi kernel module with debug prints -- You may reply to this email to add a

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #46 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Created attachment 306277 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306277=edit Stock ucsi_acpi kernel module with debug prints -- You may reply to this email to add a

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #45 from Ralph Martin (ra...@cs.cf.ac.uk) --- Hi Diogo, it would probably be easier for many of us if you could provide the module and instructions on how to use it... Thanks. Ralph -- You may reply to this email to add a comment.

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #44 from Víctor (victor.ballester.r...@gmail.com) --- Same for me, but I don't know how I can compile the kernel by myself. I usually use zen kernel. -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #43 from PinkFromTheFuture (eduardoxfurt...@gmail.com) --- Great news! But could you also provide instructions on how to easily do what you are asking us to do? I would be happy to help, but I don't have time to tinker with it too

[Bug 217076] Charging causes high CPU usage on LG Gram laptops series Z90Q

2024-05-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217076 --- Comment #42 from Diogo Ivo (diogo@tecnico.ulisboa.pt) --- Hello, I think I have a fix for this problem and would like your help in confirming that the fix does indeed work and to collect all of the affected models. For that I would

[Bug 2148] ACPI: No IRQ known ... - using IRQ 255

2024-05-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2148 jackson daws (kewav53...@rencr.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kewav53...@rencr.com

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

2024-05-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 fraz...@hotmail.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fraz...@hotmail.it -- You may

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

2024-05-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Luis (lgtso...@yahoo.com.br) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lgtso...@yahoo.com.br ---

[Bug 218750] Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops

2024-04-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 Hans de Goede (jwrdego...@fedoraproject.org) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218767] New: Battery trip point default is design capacity of warning but should be design capacity of low

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218767 Bug ID: 218767 Summary: Battery trip point default is design capacity of warning but should be design capacity of low Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: All

[Bug 218750] Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops

2024-04-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 218750] Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops

2024-04-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 --- Comment #3 from Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) --- Yup, try this. If that works I'd say, go ahead and post a patch for Rafael to review. It's better than a revert. diff --git a/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c

[Bug 218750] Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops

2024-04-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 --- Comment #2 from Mark Pearson (mpearson-len...@squebb.ca) --- Created attachment 306196 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306196=edit ACPI dump Thanks Mario for the suggestion. acpidump attached -- You may reply to this

[Bug 218750] Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops

2024-04-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218750] New: Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops

2024-04-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750 Bug ID: 218750 Summary: Regression: S0ix sleep broken on 13th Gen Lenovo laptops Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: Intel OS: Linux Status:

[Bug 218557] Kernel regression in acpi/ec.c causing some AMD platforms to limit CPU frequency to < 544Mhz

2024-04-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218557 Pedro (voidpointertonull+kernelorgbugzi...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Dimitris (dimitris.on.li...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 --- Comment #10 from Quentin Smith (qsm...@gmail.com) --- (In reply to Mario Limonciello (AMD) from comment #8) > Quentin, can you try Stephen's suggestion above in comment 4 instead? > > I think that's more desirable if that works instead. To

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Rafael J. Wysocki (r...@rjwysocki.net) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

[Bug 218545] Multiple distros crash and reboot when trying to resume from sleep/suspend on laptop

2024-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218545 Armin Wolf (w_ar...@gmx.de) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||w_ar...@gmx.de --- Comment

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-04-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 --- Comment #7 from Quentin Smith (qsm...@gmail.com) --- Created attachment 306063 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306063=edit Test patch for 6.8.x I tried Mario's patch from bug 218652; unfortunately it doesn't cleanly apply

[Bug 218652] acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16

2024-03-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218652] acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16

2024-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|a...@gmx.com| -- You may reply

[Bug 218652] acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16

2024-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Mario Limonciello (AMD) (mario.limoncie...@amd.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218652] acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16

2024-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@gmx.com

[Bug 218652] acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16

2024-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@rjwysocki.net

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 --- Comment #5 from The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis) (regressi...@leemhuis.info) --- Let me at this to the regression tracker to ensure it does not fall through the cracks: #regzbot introduced: 9c8647224e9fabb765019193a

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

2024-03-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 paul idle (pid...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pid...@gmx.com --- Comment

[Bug 218652] New: acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16

2024-03-27 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218652 Bug ID: 218652 Summary: acpitz sensors regression on Linux 6.7+ on Framework 16 Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW

[Bug 218444] Lenovo Legion 9i Audio, TrackPad, Battery not detected

2024-03-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218444 Andy Shevchenko (andy.shevche...@gmail.com) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 213023] Could not resolve symbol [\_PR.CPU0._CPC]

2024-03-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 patrickc...@outlook.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||patrickc...@outlook.com ---

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #306004|0 |1 is

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 --- Comment #3 from Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) --- Created attachment 306004 --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=306004=edit Raise the max temperature of ACPI trip temps to 488K (215°C) -- You may reply to this

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) changed: What|Removed |Added Bisected commit-id|

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Frank Kruger (fkrue...@mailbox.org) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) changed: What|Removed |Added Regression|No |Yes -- You

[Bug 218586] No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Stephen Horvath (s.horv...@outlook.com.au) changed: What|Removed |Added Kernel Version||6.8.0 --

[Bug 218586] New: No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8

2024-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218586 Bug ID: 218586 Summary: No ACPI Thermal Zones after Kernel 6.8 Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 Hardware: AMD OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low

[Bug 218557] Kernel regression in acpi/ec.c causing some AMD platforms to limit CPU frequency to < 544Mhz

2024-03-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218557 --- Comment #12 from Artem S. Tashkinov (a...@gmx.com) --- Framework Phoenix laptops also seem to be affected even when running Windows: https://community.frame.work/t/amd-cpu-stuck-in-low-speed-state-after-system-resume/39921 -- You may reply

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >