http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|--- |No
--- Comment #68 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #67 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-02-22 19:22 ---
Hi, Rui
How about close this bug as this issue can be resolved by adding the boot
option of acpi=rsdt?
thanks.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #66 from vjen...@warpmail.net 2009-02-08 16:50 ---
(In reply to comment #55)
Created an attachment (id=18150)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18150action=view) [details]
quick'n dirty hack to force EC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #64 from tr...@suse.de 2009-01-07 11:47 ---
the user can be prompted
This does not work that early. You also want to have this working automatically
on every machine where you know which one to take (32/64 bit addresses).
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #65 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-01-07 16:56 ---
This is tested on vista by using KVM. On the vista the XSDT will be used
instead of RSDT when both exist.
In fact there is a presentation , which introduces ACPI on
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #63 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2009-01-04 22:29 ---
Hi, Thomas
With the help of KVM now it is confirmed that only RSDT is used on windows
XP even when both RSDT/XSDT exist. In such case the FADT obtained from RSDT
will be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #62 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-27 11:05 ---
Yeah, the time FADT provided IO addresses are touched is very early.
No assumptions about a possible supported OS or similar can be made.
If it is assumed that every X86
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #61 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-26 19:06 ---
Hi, Len
It is a burden to maitain the DMI blacklist. But IMO it is reasonable to
add the boot option of using rsdt.
From the discussion it seems that the RSDT is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #59 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-27 22:09 ---
Just as an info: I had to disable acpi wakeup sources by using acpitool -w 1.
Otherwise the R51e would only stay in suspend once after boot and would return
immediately on
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #54 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-04 00:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=18149)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18149action=view)
kernel 2.6.27-wl w/ patch -- dmesg
Sorry, I was wrong with the already
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #53 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-03 05:56 ---
I will refresh the patch in comment #26 and resend it to the ACPI mailing list
again.
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #55 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-04 00:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=18150)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18150action=view)
quick'n dirty hack to force EC pollmode
works for me
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-02 01:35 ---
Some time after my last comment I switch to wireless-testing kernel (from git)
to use the ath5k driver. I settled on a 2.6.27-rc3 which worked great.
And yesterday I applied
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-30 09:16 ---
I've been using the patch in comment #26 on kernels for about six months now
and I can confirm it works perfectly. I recommend it gets sent upstream as soon
as possible.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 00:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=16522)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16522action=view)
Thinkpad R51e 1843-6NG -- dmesg
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-17 00:55 ---
I've applied the patch from comment #26 to 2.6.24-gentoo-r8 on my Thinpad R51e
and while ACPI events now work (hurray! I can't rememeber if or when this
worked before :-)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-19 15:06 ---
ACPI Error (tbfadt-0475): 32/64X address mismatch in Gpe0Block: [8020]
[8028], using 64X [20070126]
Would we not need to use the RSDT and the other FADT if
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 05:00 ---
Thomas,
Sorry for taking a while to get back to you. I've tried the patch from comment
23 on my thinkpad R40e.
It works well and solves the original ACPI problem and when
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-03 10:25 ---
Thomas,
I've tried your patch. It works from the point of view of loading the modules
and reading the battery state from /proc/ but none of the acpi buttons (volume,
mute,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-01 12:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=16003)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16003action=view)
Fix up length fiddling of event block in xFADT addresses
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-01 12:24 ---
Can someone try the patch from comment #43, pls.
If this one works, it's the way to go.
While Yakui's patch is nice from a generic point of view, it violates the spec
and has
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-22 08:03 ---
Can everybody affected, pls have a look at or attach dmidecode.
Is there one with a BIOS version 1SET*WW?
For these machines C-states are disabled/blacklisted, the patch from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-22 08:05 ---
shows more than C-state?
shows more than one, but three working C-states?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-22 09:18 ---
From googling, I expect the only ThinkPad showing the C-state freeze with 1SET*
BIOS seem to be the R40e. Already the R40 has a 1PET BIOS...
Mark Doughty has a R40e...
Mark, I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-19 09:07 ---
Ok I can confirm this patch works. Finally after using 2.6.22 for ages i can
update. Thank you all for your effort.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-17 03:33 ---
Is this already in the acpi git tree? I couldn'T find the commit.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-17 18:18 ---
No, it's not.
Yakui, please push len to merge this patch.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-16 06:46 ---
P.S. I think this should go upstream. I like this patch a lot.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #33 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-23 23:22 ---
(In reply to comment #32)
I've applied the patch in comment #26 and enabled ACPI_DEBUG - the result is
in attachment #15398 [details].
Curiously, ACPI events for the lid
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #34 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-24 15:18 ---
Hi,
I've just tested the patch in comment #26 again and--for the most part--works.
:)
My reservations are that the sleep button (ACPI ibm/hotkey, Fn-F4 key) only
triggers
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-09 17:39 ---
HI, Chris
Will you please enable the acpi debug function in kernel configuration and
attach the full dmesg ? ( Please apply the patch in comment #26).
Thanks.
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|no acpi interrupts - IBM|32/64X address mismatch in
41 matches
Mail list logo
