http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
zerot...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zerot...@yahoo.com
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #171 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-12-24
15:34:19 ---
@alexey: I have just tried with my 2.6.33-rc1 (from wireless-testing) and
result is the same. key stuck after a couple of tests through 9147test.sh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22179|0 |1
is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #173 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-12-24
15:45:02 ---
Adding 'nosoftrepeat' does nothing on my hardware (bug is still there), and
anyway my softrepeat is already 0 so you shouldn't try with 'nosoftrepeat' if
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #174 from Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de 2009-12-24
15:52:51 ---
Could you please check if last patch from this bug reports helps:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14858
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #175 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-12-24
16:14:58 ---
ok, I am gonna check the patch in a while
do you know how to detect BIOS and EC versions? My notebook is basically a
Fujitsu Siemens V2000 with
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #176 from Alexey Starikovskiy astarikovs...@suse.de 2009-12-24
16:22:00 ---
dmidecode may have this information
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #177 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-12-24
16:35:01 ---
@alexey: I have applied accel_query_propogation.patch and after running
9147test.sh 4 times I get the enter key stuck bug. I have attached the dmesg of
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #178 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-12-24
16:35:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=24298)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=24298)
dmesg of last 4 runs of 9147test.sh with a 2.6.33-rc1 kernel +
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #179 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-12-24
16:40:50 ---
Loading/unloading the battery module checks the battery status, but in the
attached dmesg it's not clear if battery is there or not.
Please ignore such
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #169 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-12-21 11:22:10 ---
Daniele, thanks for pointing that out. Recently on Fedora 12 similar problem
emerged w/ same symptoms (some key is locked, Tab usually) but w/o the
message in dmesg.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #168 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-12-08
12:19:48 ---
Interesting related pages:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0602.2/1795.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181457
My
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #166 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-09-12 09:27:51 ---
Likely some of them will, but the problem is that the bug is not *that* sucking
to interest enough of kernel upstream. That's how it goes..
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #167 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-09-12
10:51:58 ---
Yes but some weeks ago Alexey Starikovskiy got this bug assigned, is something
being studied for the solution?
@Alexey Starikovskiy: any news?
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #164 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-09-11 16:38:00 ---
Just to let others know that I just came across this bug again with
2.6.31-0.204.rc9.fc12.i686.
atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0xe0 on
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #165 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-09-11
16:55:23 ---
@Michal: I think that when Windows XP will be declared unsupported many people
will try installing linux on hardware from this generation and, guess
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
Len Brown len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #163 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-07-16
10:35:24 ---
After about 2 weeks I triggered (once) the stuck-keys bug even with the
built-in ACPI modules.
In order to trigger the 9142 kernel bug also with recent
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #161 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-07-03
13:07:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=22191)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=22191)
bug 9147 test results on kernels 2.6.29 (w/o fedora11 patches),
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #13737|0 |1
is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #157 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-07-02
15:35:30 ---
@Michal: good news! I have been using the F10 live cd and everything works
fine! That kernel has the ac,battery,thermal modules builtin.
I would say
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #158 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-07-02
17:00:12 ---
I have downloaded
http://mirror.cc.vt.edu/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/kernel-2.6.29.5-191.fc11.src.rpm
which contains the 2.6.29 kernel and all the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #159 from Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-07-02
17:01:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=22178)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=22178)
full list of patches applied by Fedora11 to the 2.6.29 kernel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #156 from Michal Nowak mno...@redhat.com 2009-06-04 11:06:40 ---
Since I moved from Gentoo 2 yrs ago to Fedora I've experienced the problem only
twice in times of Fedora 8. Now with Fedora 10, I've never seen them: is it
possible
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
Daniele C. legolas...@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|--- |No
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #153 from David Oftedal da...@start.no 2009-05-07 01:30:59 ---
I'd like to report a potentially positive finding. After upgrading to Ubuntu
version 9.04 - the Jaunty Jackalope, which I did in April when it was released,
I haven't
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|high|blocking
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #152 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-24 05:12
---
I can witness (by empirical experience) that with ACPI modules loaded (ac +
battery + thermal) and battery in slot, the bug appears often.
@ykzhao: can you
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #150 from da...@start.no 2009-02-21 18:58 ---
I can confirm what I said earlier. While the X server is apparently still on
console 7, pressing Ctrl-Alt-F1 when the bug appears refreshes the screen
somehow and clears the bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #149 from da...@start.no 2009-02-17 12:56 ---
Ah, thanks. It seems to be thermal that's the main culprit for me, as the bug
starts appearing when the computer heats up and the fan starts spinning faster.
I noticed something
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #147 from da...@start.no 2009-02-16 10:19 ---
Unfortunately, on this machine acpi=off doesn't work either, as that stops the
WLAN card from working... Is there any other option that will stop the bug from
occurring, or at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #148 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-16 14:29
---
@David: the best workaround is NOT to turn off acpi but to unload ac,battery
and thermal modules
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #146 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-02-08 09:09
---
@Eugen: ok, really thanks for having tested this out.
I can also confirm that 'hpet=force clocksource=hpet' does not workaround the
bug. It is not relevant.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #145 from absolut.l...@gmx.net 2009-01-31 14:52 ---
@Daniele,
sorry that i have not responded a long time... unfortunately, i really lack
free time :(
) 2.6.28 sidux kernels do not fix the issue
) acpi_osi=Linux (
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #143 from gy.schm...@gmail.com 2009-01-30 18:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=20049)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20049action=view)
Tentative workaround patch
To be applied against 2.6.28 branch, but is
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #144 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-01-30 21:40
---
I can witness that with patch in attachment 20049 the problem happened only
once in a week, while without any patch I can experience it 10/20 times per
day.
I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #142 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-01-29 23:39
---
Please see bug 1203.
On this hardware I also have clocksource problems. I am currently booting with
'clocksource=acpi_pm i8042.nomux=1' to have an usable
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #139 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-01-24 08:34
---
(in reply to comment 137)
thank you very much David for showing us the root of the bug, I will CC this
comment to Andries Brouwer just in case he can confirm.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #140 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-01-24 09:30
---
(In reply to comment #119)
The i8042.nomux=1 is no more necessary with kernel = 2.6.25
I have tried the latest linux-2.6.27-rc9 with the patch in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #138 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-01-23 07:01
---
(In reply to comment #136)
My scenario -comment #73- was related to a KVM USB switch. Whenever I bypass
the switch the issues disappears. The ACPI workaround
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #137 from da...@start.no 2009-01-19 19:05 ---
The bug is in fact from as far back as 2003:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/9/15/210
The user begins by complaining about the familiar errors:
Sep 14 20:42:27 cpp kernel: atkbd.c:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
da...@start.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||da...@start.no
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #135 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-01-18 02:11
---
Created an attachment (id=19874)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19874action=view)
DSDT AML for Maxdata 7000X, fixed errors and compiled with
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #136 from sta...@gmail.com 2009-01-18 16:08 ---
My scenario -comment #73- was related to a KVM USB switch. Whenever I bypass
the switch the issues disappears. The ACPI workaround didn't work for me.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #133 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2008-12-29 14:01
---
Seems that my DSDT has some bad errors. I am not able to fix them...
---
Intel ACPI Component Architecture
ASL Optimizing Compiler version 20061109 [May 16
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
legolas...@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17506|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #134 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2008-12-29 14:59
---
The first error can be easily fixed by using ByteAcc; the second error is
something weird.
The Amilo M7400, almost a clone by hardware specs, had the same
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #128 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2008-12-28 02:13
---
A friend suggested me that perhaps we could use approach used in bug 12021, and
an opportunely modified patch similar to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #129 from legolas...@users.sourceforge.net 2008-12-28 04:55
---
Friend in comment 128 is Grégory Schmitt
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmitry.torok...@gmail.com,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #127 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-07 11:47 ---
Correction: with Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex I could trigger the nasty bug only once
when I was using battery (no AC plugged) and the wireless network adapter. I
think the two are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #125 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-27 14:23 ---
i have today tried the current sidux kernel 2.6.27-7.slh.1-sidux-686 (vanilla
kernel + sidux patches) on an fujitsu siemens amilo pro v2000 notebook...
unfortunatelly, this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #126 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-27 14:30 ---
@Eugen: my notebook, Maxdata 7000X, is a clone of FS Amilo Pro v2000, so I
assume our hardware base is almost the same.
Can you please try an Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex LiveDVD?
I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #121 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 04:55 ---
Bug does not happen with Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex kernel 2.6.27-7
I don't know where's the magic, but I am booting with no special kernel
parameter, it simply works (TM)
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #123 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-23 12:25 ---
@erik: my last test was that of comment 119 (2.6.27-rc9), and was not
successful. I am no more involved in Gentoo but I can provide the hardware via
SSH as said in comment
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #124 from
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Config-Interrupts |EC
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #120 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 11:07 ---
If some developer could take benefit from it, I can offer my hardware via SSH
for some hours (with a booted LiveCD)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #119 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 00:38 ---
The i8042.nomux=1 is no more necessary with kernel = 2.6.25
I have tried the latest linux-2.6.27-rc9 with the patch in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #114 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-25 11:34 ---
The only patch which needs corrections seem to be ec_asus.patch, I will skip it
as I do not own an Asus
Let's see what happens..
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #116 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-25 12:43 ---
I have found other 4 lines in dmesg:
atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0xe0 on isa0060/serio0).
atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e060 keycode' to make it
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #117 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-25 12:48 ---
Ok, got a stuck key while browsing on menuconfig...
@ykzhao: patches 2+3+4 do not fix the bug
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #118 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-25 18:34 ---
Hi, Daniele
thanks for the test.
Sorry that I paste the incorrect patch in comment #98.
Thanks for the confirmation that the issue can't be resolved by the attached
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #111 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-24 00:35 ---
Hi, Daniele
You can try all the patches on the latest kernel(for example: 2.6.27-rc6).
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #112 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-24 09:27 ---
just downloaded 2.6.27-rc6 from:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/linux-2.6.27-rc6.tar.bz2
Will try ASAP
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #113 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-24 10:06 ---
DOES NOT WORK.
Maybe I should apply patches in a different order?
I won't go on unless all hunks are successful
Here is my shell output:
-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #103 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09 03:43 ---
@ykzhao: I will test within next few hours
Thanks
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #104 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09 04:56 ---
What kernel shall I use specifically? I have tried to apply the first 2 patches
to the latest git (retrieved with 'git clone
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.(9-11), 2.6.22-r(8-9), |2.6: .(9-11), .22-r(8-9),
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #106 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09 06:27 ---
I guess you are expected to *apply* those patches to 2.6.27-rc5.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #107 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09 07:23 ---
@mnowak: read comment #104
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #109 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09 08:47 ---
...and anyway it fails
ec_gpe_storm.patch and ec_work_mode.patch are missing 1 hunk each (respectively
3rd and 2nd)
I won't compile the patched kernel without all hunks
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #98 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 19:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=17689)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17689action=view)
Patch 1/4 : Don't issue the burst disable command if EC exits the burst
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #99 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 19:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=17690)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17690action=view)
Patch 2/4: Clear the query_pending bit only after processing EC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #100 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 19:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=17691)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17691action=view)
Patch 3/4: Simplify EC working flowchart and always enable EC GPE
--
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #101 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 19:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=17692)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17692action=view)
patch 4/4: Add some udelay in EC GPE handler to avoid EC GPE interrupt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #102 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 19:38 ---
From the acpidump info it seems that there exist the following definition
in many ACPI control method.
Method (_Q31, 0, NotSerialized)
{
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #97 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-31 00:18 ---
ACPI is of course supported, as it works through Windows XP.
The page you are referring to, http://gentoo-wiki.com/Maxdata_Pro_7000DX, was
authored by me - so it does not
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #96 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-29 07:46 ---
Hmm, I have the very same problem on acer TravelMate 243LC and I doubt that
BIOS is the same on those two models. I'll look further into it, yet I don't
think it is one
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #93 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-28 06:28 ---
Hi ykzhao,
yes I confirm that I get:
atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0xe0 on isa0060/serio0).
atkbd.c: Use 'setkeycodes e060 keycode' to make it
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #94 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-28 06:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=17506)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17506action=view)
first lines of 'dmidecode' output, unique ids and serial numbers removed
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #95 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-28 18:56 ---
Hi, Daniele
Thanks for the confirm. It seems that it is a very old BIOS.(10/23/03). I
am not sure whether ACPI is supported very well on this laptop.
At the same time I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #92 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-27 20:33 ---
Hi, Daniele
Will you please confirm whether the system is affected by the following
message?
atkbd.c: Unknown key released (translated set 2, code 0xe0 on
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #87 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-14 06:22 ---
It happens with any type of key, not only the special Fn keys.
The patch in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.15/+bug/39315/comments/2
does not seem
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #88 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-14 06:31 ---
On 2008-08-12 I upgraded to gentoo-sources-2.6.25-r7
The bug seems fixed.
I will post another comment if it is not.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #89 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-14 06:59 ---
It seems fixed with gentoo-sources-2.6.25-r7 and gentoo-sources-2.6.25-r6.
I haven't tested with others.
The only recent change to my parameters was adding
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #90 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-14 07:07 ---
From my emerge.log (grep gentoo-sources):
2008-07-19 12:56:49 -emerge (7 of 10)
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.25-r6 to /
2008-07-19 12:56:49 - === (7 of 10) Cleaning
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #86 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-13 21:54 ---
Can we say that the problem happens only with Fn+? keys?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #84 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 04:07 ---
If I run:
rmmod ac thermal; modprobe ac; modprobe thermal
I almost instantly get keyboard stuck keys. Sometimes the ENTER key used to run
the command is even duplicated! Like
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #85 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 05:52 ---
Another guy having the same problem:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00014.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||9448
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #83 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-03 06:50 ---
@Sebastien: thanks for these useful informations, I hope we can get to a
solution for this nasty bug.
Here are some downstream / duplicates of this bug:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #80 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-22 07:36 ---
Keyboard mode cannot be changed in BIOS (PhoenixBIOS). This notebook is a
Fujitsu-Siemens V2000 Pro exact copy, which is sold as 'Maxdata Pro 7000DX'
(internal product name
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #81 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-22 07:54 ---
There's to say that, as far as I know, this notebook has a real PS/2 keyboard
and PS/2 touchpad which are linked to the i8042.
Up to now the most interesting comment to fix
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9147
--- Comment #82 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-22 13:02 ---
Hello,
I saw something interesting a few days ago:
I updated the bios of my msi l745 laptop to the latest version.
After reboot, the unknown key released messages were not
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
