http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 00:17 ---
The BIOS indeed doesn't reserve 0x290-0x29f, but it reserves 0x290-0x294, with
no good reason as far as I can see.
"This will cause the system to run unstable" is another way t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8532
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 00:46 ---
Is someone working on this, or has it been put to the back of the queue? An
update would be appreciated than it just going ignored.
Although, if it is going to get ignored, th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10010
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: htt
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017
User [EMAIL PROTECTED] added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=350017#c32
--- Comment #32 from Oskar Eisemuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-25 02:28:09
MST ---
The Abit AX78 may have the same error, I haven't had yet a chanc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #75 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 01:30 ---
This is a bug in the ACPI interpreter in the kernel - editing the DSDT is only
a workaround until the guys at Intel figure out how this DSDT works on Windows,
and can then apply
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9915
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 01:46 ---
Will you please try the boot option of "pci=nommconf acpi.debug_layer=0x01
acpi.debug_level=0x17 " and attach the output? (Use the 2.6.23.1 kernel).
Thanks.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 01:59 ---
Hi, Zygfryd
Will you please upload the full dmesg output?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving thi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5809
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 03:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=14977)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14977&action=view)
dmesg and other logs
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/u
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-24 08:15 ---
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have exactly the same problem on Acer Aspire 5720.
Sensors are not updated. In my case sensors are not updated even when i just
start the laptop.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-24 16:16 ---
Regressions list annotation:
Handled-By : Zhang Rui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving thi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10093
Summary: 2.6.25-current-git hangs on boot
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Seve
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 03:37 ---
but somebody recommended option: EC_INTR=0
to kernel line in grub and I'm testing it also - so far (lets say half a day)
no errors with this parameter regarding battery and acp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #23 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 03:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=14978)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14978&action=view)
dmesg and other logs - now with battery status unknown
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10056
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from [E
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 03:31 ---
My laptop's acpidump (T30) is already attached to bug #10047.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail bec
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 04:52 ---
> Please apply this patch, find which acpi_video device backlight sys I/F can
> work for you and attach the result of cat
> /sys/class/backlight/acpi_videoX/acpi_dev/path.
>
t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10089
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-24 10:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=14963)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14963&action=view)
output of dmidecode on lifebook p7010
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8532
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 16:59 ---
Anyone working on this or not?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 06:48 ---
I expect the problem is:
- The external graphics ACPI device is using the traditional method to switch
brightness, it also works for the internal (Intel) graphics device
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10089
Summary: no sysfs backlight interface on lifebook p7010
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: Any kernel version
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Sta
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 07:53 ---
ups, even with ec_intr=0 it is not working properly, battery "disappearing"
again sometimes
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Y
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8570
--- Comment #53 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 23:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=14955)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14955&action=view)
patch vs 2.6.25-rc1
just for the record, here is the incremental patch vs
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10094
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 08:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=14980)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14980&action=view)
/proc/acpi/battery/info (no battery actually inserted)
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10094
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 08:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=14981)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14981&action=view)
/proc/acpi/battery/state (no battery at all)
--
Configure bugmail: http
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|low |normal
--- Comment #18 from [EM
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10093
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #62 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 12:03 ---
Tested 2.6.25-rc3 today. It appeared harder to reproduce the problem, I did
s2disk, s2disk, s2disk, and then s2ram. Problems only occurred on resume from
that s2ram. Did not tes
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9163
--- Comment #63 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 12:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=14983)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14983&action=view)
2.6.25-rc3 dmesg with sequence of s2disk s2disk s2ram s2disk
--
Configu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
Summary: 208c70a45624400fafd7511b96bc426bf01f8f5e breaks EC init
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
St
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 13:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=14986)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14986&action=view)
acpidump
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 13:25 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> I finally found that the problematic option is "Kernel->user space relay
> support". I have build 2.6.25-rc3 with CPU idle enabled and "user space r
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 22:08 ---
zdenek,
please set CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO and modprobe video after system boot.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-24 15:10 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It may have been a coincidence that the
> workqueue was running during a suspend.
I think it is because it does not happen every time.
--
Configu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 21:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=14946)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14946&action=view)
debug patch
Please apply this patch and attach the dmesg output.
Then ple
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14946|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #7 from [EMAI
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-23 15:27 ---
To any ACPI experts reading this bug report: Is it truly necessary to register
a new device (acpi_add_single_object) while the system is suspending or
resuming?
Would it be
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #14964|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 09:37 ---
It looks like this trace precedes the undocking oops. I.e., I can see this
trace and after it, undocking produces the oops mentioned above.
[86836.756886] ACPI: \_SB_.GDCK - doc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10071
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
Summary: 2.6.25-rc2 Regression Thinkpad acpi
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc2-git7
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||9832
nThis|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 15:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=14991)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14991&action=view)
test patch
Please check if this patch helps
--
Configure bugmail: http
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: I cannot boot fedora after updating the kernel on a sony vaio
vgn-fe41z laptop.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432477
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10104
Summary: 2.6.25-rc3: WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:137
Product: Platform Specific/Hardware
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainlin
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9514
--- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-23 10:36 ---
Gigabyte wrote me:
our bios open only the resource for 0295 to 0296 not 0X290-0x29F.
They cannot open reserve 0X290-0X29, this will cause the system to run
unstable.
According
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9226
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9874
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-23 13:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=14961)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14961&action=view)
Patch removing the locking of devices from the suspend core
Lukas, can yo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
--- Comment #74 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 19:01 ---
One question : does it mean the problem comes from the kernel and it should be
fixed or that I need to do this for each new kernel ?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ker
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10093
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9754
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 16:28 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I see the same issue for Aser Aspire 5720G.
>
> P.S. It looks like bug 9167 "No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) -
> Acer Aspire 5720, 7
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9945
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 06:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=14950)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14950&action=view)
dmesg after the patching
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9772
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10011
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9945
--- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-21 22:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=14948)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14948&action=view)
debug patch
there is only invalid notify 0x81 for AC on this laptop.
For
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8570
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 23:01 ---
the patch in comment #21 shipped in Linux-2.6.25-rc1
today it was updated to be the patch in comment #49 in the acpi test tree.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.o
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9945
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Config
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: I cannot boot fedora after updating the kernel on a sony vaio
vgn-fe41z laptop.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432477
--- Additional Comments
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10104
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10104
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 16:18 ---
*** Bug 10072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail bec
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10042
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 17:23 ---
Hi, Erik
The error log in comment #3 is caused by the broken BIOS.
>Method (_BQC, 0, NotSerialized)
> {
>Return (Index (BTBL, \_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC0.BKLG)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10042
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 17:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=14993)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14993&action=view)
try the custom DSDT
Will you please try the custom DSDT ?
How to use the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 17:25 ---
Comment #6 seems to indicate that my transparent bridge sizing patch
is no longer the prime suspect but if I can reproduce the problem
with my T41p I will try to figure out the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10089
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 18:05 ---
Will you please attach the output of dmesg and acpidump?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 19:43 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I expect the problem is:
> - The external graphics ACPI device is using the traditional method to
> switch
> brightness, it also works for the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 20:18 ---
One has to revert commit 208c70a45624400fafd7511b96bc426bf01f8f5e for testing
if this bug is fixed (until bug 10100 is fixed, that is).
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10010
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Configure bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #26 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 22:00 ---
Thanks for the info.
>From the info in comment #18 we can know that sometimes the design capacity is
less than the remaining capacity.
>remaining capacity: 3769 mAh
>p
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9945
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 22:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=14998)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=14998&action=view)
dmesg output
Hello,
> What Rui said in comment #13 is right. There is no
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9823
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-25 22:47 ---
that is great comment sir :-)
but let me tell you the story: I already changed BIOS maybe 10 times,
on MSI web page
(http://global.msi.com.tw/index.php?func=downloaddetail&type
81 matches
Mail list logo