[Bug 9761] unsupported ACPI video device

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9761 --- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 00:04 --- by the way, thanks for the time you spent on it. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 9167] No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) - Acer Aspire 5720, 7720Z - Santa Rosa, T7300

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 --- Comment #58 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 00:53 --- Yesterday after an over heating shut down, my PC thermal/cooling control (on 64 kernel) was working fine. This is the first time I saw that. Temperature in

[Bug 9167] No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) - Acer Aspire 5720, 7720Z - Santa Rosa, T7300

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 --- Comment #60 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 01:24 --- - Value /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/temperature was going up and down as per real temperature (But by step of 5 °C, at least this was my feeling) - Fan was controlled properly ...

[Bug 9167] No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) - Acer Aspire 5720, 7720Z - Santa Rosa, T7300

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 --- Comment #59 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 01:18 --- Stephane, what do you mean by Temperature in /proc/acpi/thermal_zone/temperature was updated? Did it change continuously during use or was it just different from 0 C after

[Bug 10104] 2.6.25-rc3: WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:137

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10104 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 02:51 --- Can you provide a pointer to the patch, please? Or, has it already been merged? sorry, not merged yet. -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 9167] No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) - Acer Aspire 5720, 7720Z - Santa Rosa, T7300

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 --- Comment #61 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 02:52 --- What did you do to this??? I need to use my notebook : -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 10119] Panasonic CF-30F Toughbook doesn't boot

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10119 --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 06:55 --- Sorry for the delay. Yes, with the custom DSDT the kernel 2.6.23 boots. Will that be some kind of greylisting then? Ignore/Patch the DSDT if this machine/this version? --

[Bug 165150] Fedora ACPI meta-bug.

2008-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Fedora ACPI meta-bug. Alias: FCMETA_ACPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165150 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed

[Bug 10183] New: cpu wakes constantly from C3

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10183 Summary: cpu wakes constantly from C3 Product: ACPI Version: 2.5 KernelVersion: v2.6.25-rc3-347-gcad226b Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW

[Bug 10183] cpu wakes constantly from C3

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10183 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 11:08 --- I have not investigated if this is a regression. It's a brand new machine, so I have no exprience with older kernels. -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 10100] 208c70a45624400fafd7511b96bc426bf01f8f5e breaks EC init

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure

[Bug 23216] Re: clock is wrong after resume when hardware clock is set to localtime

2008-03-06 Thread Daniel Hahler
Is this the same as bug 36815? If so, you might want to try the proposed fix there (or tell me how it needs to be improved). Thank you. ** Changed in: acpi-support (Ubuntu) Importance: Low = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Hahler (blueyed) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete --

[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port

2008-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 [EMAIL

[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port

2008-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 [EMAIL

[Bug 9903] fujitsu-laptop creates /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/ entries, but brightness doesn't change if you echo values to them. Amilo Pi 2515

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9903 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 17:51 --- Hi, Eric, it seems that you don't need to use the fujitsu-laptop driver. Please apply the patch at http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10042#c8, set CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO and

[Bug 9903] fujitsu-laptop creates /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/ entries, but brightness doesn't change if you echo values to them. Amilo Pi 2515

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9903 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 18:48 --- I'll give this a go on my S7020. I had a look at the patch but it seems to relate to systems where the ACPI video driver actually accepts the hardware. On my S7020 from memory

[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port

2008-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 ---

[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port

2008-03-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 [EMAIL

[Bug 9903] fujitsu-laptop creates /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/ entries, but brightness doesn't change if you echo values to them. Amilo Pi 2515

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9903 --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 19:05 --- From the acpidump attached, we can see that the Fujitsu-Siemens Amilo Pi 2515 backlight control go via ACPI video extensions rather than Fujitsu platform specific control

[Bug 9903] fujitsu-laptop creates /sys/class/backlight/fujitsu-laptop/ entries, but brightness doesn't change if you echo values to them. Amilo Pi 2515

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9903 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 19:21 --- Ah right, yes, I see that now: the Pi 2515 backlight goes via ACPI while the one on the S7020 doesn't. As to the second point, it's a good thought. I'll look into this. You

[Bug 9526] ACPI: Error installing bay notify handler - Acer PentiumM

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9526 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 9526] ACPI: Error installing bay notify handler - Acer PentiumM

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9526 --- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 22:05 --- Hi, Kristen From the log in comment #10 and #7 it seems that this bug is related with bay driver. In this laptop the bay1 device is located in _SB_.PCI0.IDE0.SECN. And

[Bug 10139] fujitsu-laptop inconsistency due to hardware controlled fn-keys

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10139 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-06 22:52 --- Please attach the acpidump output as well. thanks -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 8246] 32/64X address mismatch in Gpe0Block - IBM Thinkpad R51e

2008-03-06 Thread bugme-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8246 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|no acpi interrupts - IBM|32/64X address mismatch in