[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #36 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 01:22 --- (not sure whether out of the box, it must take the right (or say wrong) VID device) That was wrong from myself, it does not use the video device at all (for brightness switching), therefore it should always work. Henrique said something about not working brightness_mode=1 in comment #32..., but from Len's and Lukas' comments it just seem to work, right? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|CODE_FIX| -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 10279] suspend slow in 2.6.25-rc6
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10279 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] BugsThisDependsOn||9998 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE | --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 01:34 --- In this case it's not a duplicate (bug 9998 is not a user-visible regression from 2.6.24), but it depends on this bug being fixed. Reopening, since otherwise we would lose this bug being tracked as a 2.6.25 regression. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||10279 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #37 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 01:48 --- (In reply to comment #36) That was wrong from myself, it does not use the video device at all (for brightness switching), therefore it should always work. Henrique said something about not working brightness_mode=1 in comment #32..., but from Len's and Lukas' comments it just seem to work, right? No, I use brightness_enable=1, I do not use brightness_mode=1. So I cannot tell the latter works. Though, I wonder why gnome increases or decreases brightness by 2, not just by 1, but it is most probably userspace issue. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 02:04 --- (In reply to comment #35) Using the native mode, if I decrease the brightness to 0, I'm unable to return it to any higher value. Why do you open a kernel bug, if you know it's X to blame? the kernel bug was opened due to nonfuctional /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0 Lukas could you give this a last test, pls. When you load the video driver you should get a message that brightness control is ignored and it should work out of the box (without a param) when loading the thinkpad_acpi driver). Then you could even get video output switching on console and with vesafb working instead of writing to some arbitrary HW which does not exist. with the patch #30 I got: [ 11.216611] thinkpad_acpi: Lenovo ThinkPad found. Taking control over brightness switching so it seems it works even if X.org uses the kernel method instead of native one. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9167] No TZ.temp update, no fan control (64-bit only) - Acer Aspire 5720, 7720Z - Santa Rosa, T7300
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9167 --- Comment #69 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 02:59 --- Created an attachment (id=15344) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15344action=view) Archive containing Acer 5720 Fan Control Script + Binary Patcher This is the fix I sent to Davis Cabral. It is an archive containing a script and binary for controlling the CPU fan on an Acer 5720 or similar under a 64 bit Linux. Apologies in advance if this is considered an abuse of the Kernel Bug Tracker. To use it: -Unpack with tar xjf acer5720_fan_64.tar.bz2 -Adjust tunable parameters in acer5720_fancontrol.sh to your taste. Copy mempat and acer5720_fancontrol.sh somewhere convenient, bearing in mind that acer5720_fancontrol.sh needs to find mempat in its PATH. Arrange for acer5720_fancontrol.sh to be executed at start-up, eg. (as on my Ubuntu) kicking it off in the background from /etc/rc.local. Hope this helps, no liability accepted for bringing about the end of the world etc. etc. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 10279] suspend slow in 2.6.25-rc6
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10279 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|CLOSED Resolution||CODE_FIX --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 05:58 --- Fixed by: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d7a0e1f56472db0825e13f9dd39f0ad79b8c8b3e -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9432] unable to turn cooling device 'off' - LG LE50 Express laptop
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9432 --- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 05:59 --- Confirmed on 2.6.25-rc6 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 --- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:04 --- Now I'm a little confused. I previously (i.e. comment #39, comment #41) reverted acpi_ec_detect_irq_storm.patch, but since restore_poll_udelay.patch doesn't make any sense without it, I applied it again. add_poll_timer.patch also doesn't fully apply without it. Beside the three mentioned patches, I applied call_psw_on_capable_devices.patch. I'm still using 2.6.24.2 as a base. Please tell me if I did as intended, or what I should have done. With all these patches, everything works fine, the number of ACPI-interrupts stays constant (~800) even when polling the battery. But I suppose, this is due to acpi_ec_detect_irq_storm.patch. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:08 --- Better take off the kid gloves. 1. NVidia-GPU-based thinkpads are NOT Intel-GPU-based thinkpads. DO NOT CONFUSE WHAT IS SAID ABOUT ONE WITH THE OTHER. EVER. 2. *IF* you have an Intel GPU (*NOT* AN NVIDIA OR ATI GPU), FIX X.org. It must either be completely out of the way, or working. And right now X.org is only completely out of the way if it is NOT running. 3. *IF* AND ONLY *IF* thinkpad-acpi brightness_mode=1 *can* control your backlight, you can bypass X.org, ACPI and the BIOS completely and talk semi-directly to the backlight hardware. In that case, you might be able to work around issues in ACPI video and X.org using thinkpad-acpi. I DOUBT THIS HOLDS TRUE FOR ANY *61 THINKPAD. (if it is not clear yet: thinkpad-acpi calls the same crap ACPI video ultimately uses in a ThinkPad, unless it is in brightness_mode=1. It can be used to check if something hosed ACPI video (e.g. X.org), because if neither thinkpad-acpi nor ACPI video can change brightness, SOMETHING blocked the ThinkPad BIOS itself). Now, about how to fix it. Can we, for once, stop destroying any possibility of fixing backlight support and actually start fixing the underlying BUGS instead of band-aiding over it please? Forget the last minute *anythings*. Fix the real bugs and address the design issues, because the haphazard way this was done till in kernel, distros and X.org created a LOT of design incompatibilities between them. ACPI Video and X.org HAVE to talk to each other. X.org must be able to tell ACPI Video driver to go into an I'm not here mode, where it just acts as an ACPI notify-ACPI event repeater. And X.org is NOT to do *anything* to backlight hardware registers UNLESS it disabled ACPI video first (if it is loaded). X.org hardware drivers needs to be fixed, if they are not controlling backlight properly. Until X.org is fixed, the user gets broken backlight. Don't work around it breaking things further in the kernel side, especially while X.org still doesn't know how to tell the kernel to butt off, nor the kernel knows how to be told to go away. Fix the bug WHERE IT REALLY IS. ACPI video, if it is indeed not working, needs to be fixed. BUT YOU WILL NEVER KNOW whether it is working right or not WHILE YOU HAVE X.org RUNNING. After the above is done, we have a chance of actually doing the right thing in every X.org driver (enable or disable kernel support, use or don't use the kernel backlight interface). Then, we will have ACPI video being called to *change* brightness when it is right to do so, and with exclusive access to the backlight control. Or we will have X.org changing the brightness directly in hardware, and ACPI video will know it must *block* (even for reading!) any attempts to access the ACPI AML backlight methods. And *PLEASE* remove ANY AND ALL backlight key control crap on distros that fucks up thinkpads. NOTHING in userspace that could be shipped in a distro has ANY business listening to thinkpad-acpi backlight events *and* *acting* on them to *CHANGE* any brightness hardware. EVER. You will either get events you can use like that through ACPI video, or the thinkpad already did it in firmware. If you got to know of any backlight key presses through thinkpad-acpi, it can be used for on-screen-display ONLY. Anything else is a distro bug from hell. And mapping thinkpad-acpi brightness events to KEY_BRIGHTNESS_* or the HAL equivalent *WILL* *BREAK* *THINGS* because userspace as a rule does NOT know you really mean that as an on-screen-display event instead of this is an order for you to change the brightness. Also, if X.org is acting on the brightness keys by itself (ask X.org upstream about it, I don't know for sure), DON'T act on them in distro scripts either. You will break things just as much, if not MORE than what was done to thinkpad-acpi. Does *this* makes things a little more clear? Hmm? PS: by distros I don't necessarily mean SuSE. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 --- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 06:49 --- Right. Sorry for confusion. acpi_ec_detect_irq_storm caused several side effects, so it requires 2 more patches with it, one of them big (add_poll_timer). It is too late to add such a big patch at rc6, so we need to to revert acpi_ec_detect_irq_storm now, and send all 3 patches up for 2.6.26-rc1. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 10224] kacpid and kacpi_notify takes 90 % of cpu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10224 --- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 08:47 --- I tested both patches, in comment #17 and the updated in comment #21 and the bug seems fixed in my system, still im not sure why the system worked after hard reseting windows. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 12:22 EST --- Looks like we also need commit a7f9b1f24974da287771e2d70b30d9ca7bd66684 before this fix will work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6 |8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 12:24 EST --- (a7f9b1f24974da287771e2d70b30d9ca7bd66684 is needed in 2.6.24) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 10265] oops after resume from acpi S3
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10265 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 09:32 --- Ok - the bisection is just frustrating - the testing of the acpi functionality with a crashing kernel or without the networking subsystem (the acpid tells me, that it can't open the event socket). So I'm a little stuck. Not sure where to go on. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 09:34 --- (In reply to comment #32) Current versions of X.org **enforces** this. It tells the BIOS to stop controlling the backlight levels, in a much lower level than even the ACPI interface. Hmm? at least with xf86-video-intel-2.2.1, if a kernel backlight control is detected (ACPI video or thinkpad_acpi both I think, but I've only tested it with ACPI video), it disables the native interface and just makes calls to the kernel interface. I don't know whether it still does any nasty low-level stuff even in this mode, tho. This can be changed at runtime to use the native interface, and it uses it by default if no kernel interface was found, of course. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 12:42 EST --- commit a7f9b1f24974da287771e2d70b30d9ca7bd66684 plus the patch from comment #5 added to kernel 2.6.24.3-46 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.6.24.3-34 Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 12:44 EST --- Closing this - 2.6.24.3-34 is out now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 11:23 --- If X.org is disabling the native stuff when trying to use the kernel, that's already something. It still won't fix all failure modes, though. We really need to be able to let X.org tell the ACPI video device to block all accesses to the ACPI AML for backlight control, *including* those through the sysfs backlight class it exports. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 11:29 --- (In reply to comment #41) if I understand correctly the intel driver, it *only* saves and restores backlight values at VT switches. The backlight is controlled by hal daemon using user space scripts. At least in Ubuntu/Hardy. Therefore there arose regression as the hal was unable to controll the backlight via acpi_video0 which was the only device in /sys/class/backlight/. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9961] Oops with docking and undocking, device after docking not connected
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9961
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 14:05 ---
I am still struggling with this. I do not fully understand root cause
yet but I'm betting that the hot-add of a transparent p2p bridge
(on Dock II) immediately below yet another transparent p2p bridge
(on ThinkPad) which creates a pretty complex cobweb of resource references has
something to do with it.
bus 00 --
|
00:1e.0 - ThinkPad resident Intel 82801 Mobile PCI Bridge
|transparent via pci_fixup_transparent_bridge()
|
bus 02 --
|
02:03.0 - Dock II resident Texas Instruments PCI2032 PCI
| Docking Bridge
| transparent due to programming interface == 0x01
|
bus 09 --
I have determined why we are not seeing the Oops during boot when
the Dock II already attached to the laptop. It is due to
pcibios_allocate_bus_resources() only being visited during boot.
The boot-time visit to
...
if (!r-start || !pr ||
request_resource(pr, r) 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR PCI: Cannot allocate
resource region %d
of bridge %s\n,
idx, pci_name(dev));
/*
* Something is wrong with the region.
* Invalidate the resource to prevent
* child resource allocations in this
* range.
*/
r-flags = 0;
}
...
in pcibios_allocate_bus_resources() clears the Dock II resource flags
for regions 7, 8, and 9 as evidenced by the following messages which
appear both with and without transparent bridge sizing removed.
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 7 of bridge :02:03.0
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 8 of bridge :02:03.0
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 9 of bridge :02:03.0
With the Dock II bridge resource flags for these regions cleared
the check:
if (!(r-flags) || r-parent)
continue;
in pdev_sort_resources() prevents execution from reaching
the list-next in the later:
struct resource_list *ln = list-next;
where the NULL pointer dereference occurs in the hot-add case
after one trip through the body of the enclosing for loop. In
the hot-add case, pcibios_allocate_bus_resources() is not visited
so the Dock II bridge resource flags are not cleared prior to
the call to pcibios_allocate_bus_resources().
If I am unable to come up with a solution for this that retains
the transparent bridge non-sizing in the next couple of days it
is likely that I will provide a patch that simply restores the
transparent bridge sizing. I believe the resource shortage on
some of our systems that motiviated the transparent bridge
non-sizing change no longer shows up when space is not allocated
by default for expansion ROMs. A later change that removes
default allocation for expansion ROMs is already in mainline.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 43961] Re: Power down after shutdown does not work...
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Kernel Team (ubuntu-kernel-team) Status: Incomplete = Triaged ** Changed in: baltix Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: linux Status: New = Invalid -- Power down after shutdown does not work... https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43961 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9902] Video module creates input device, but no events happen.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9902 --- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 14:52 --- Do I still have to provide full dmesg output knowing that the problem is unimplemented IGD OpRegion support? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 10285] New: backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
Summary: backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: Power-Video
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO 9832
nThis:
Regression: 1
Latest working kernel version: 2.6.25-rc5
Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.25-rc6
HW: Thinkpad X60
Steps to reproduce:
start X, close lid, reopen it, backlight flashes and then it is gone... making
machine unusable until X are exited.
This revert of 9832 fixes it:
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index 7222a18..caf873c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -943,7 +943,11 @@ int __init acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(void)
boot_ec-command_addr = ecdt_ptr-control.address;
boot_ec-data_addr = ecdt_ptr-data.address;
boot_ec-gpe = ecdt_ptr-gpe;
- boot_ec-handle = ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT;
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(NULL, ecdt_ptr-id,
+ boot_ec-handle))) {
+ pr_info(Failed to locate handle for boot EC\n);
+ boot_ec-handle = ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT;
+ }
} else {
/* This workaround is needed only on some broken machines,
* which require early EC, but fail to provide ECDT */
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 10285] backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acpi- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||et --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:27 --- This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.24. Please don't close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 10285] backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 10285] backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:31 ---
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10285
Summary: backlight is gone in X after closing/reopening the lid
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25-rc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: Power-Video
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO 9832
nThis:
Regression: 1
Latest working kernel version: 2.6.25-rc5
Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.25-rc6
HW: Thinkpad X60
Steps to reproduce:
start X, close lid, reopen it, backlight flashes and then it is gone... making
machine unusable until X are exited.
This revert of 9832 fixes it:
You mean this revert of 4af8e10a6c57e7292862bd1703712f0565c7e429
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index 7222a18..caf873c 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -943,7 +943,11 @@ int __init acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(void)
boot_ec-command_addr = ecdt_ptr-control.address;
boot_ec-data_addr = ecdt_ptr-data.address;
boot_ec-gpe = ecdt_ptr-gpe;
- boot_ec-handle = ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT;
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_handle(NULL, ecdt_ptr-id,
+ boot_ec-handle))) {
+ pr_info(Failed to locate handle for boot EC\n);
+ boot_ec-handle = ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT;
+ }
} else {
/* This workaround is needed only on some broken machines,
* which require early EC, but fail to provide ECDT */
But the patch which you're reverting is itself a revert of
Alexey's 208c70a45624400fafd7511b96bc426bf01f8f5e.
We seem to be stuck. I think we'd generally prefer the current state:
leave http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9916 unfixed.
But it's all rather confusing.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/
___
acpi-bugzilla mailing list
acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 --- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:46 --- Created an attachment (id=15349) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15349action=view) dmesg of vanilla linux-git with 2c81ce4c9c37b910210f2640c28e98a0c398dc26 reverted -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9998] SCI interrupt storm - lost keystrokes - Acer Travelmate 4002
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998 --- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 15:49 --- Created an attachment (id=15350) -- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15350action=view) dmesg of linux-git with the 3 patches My dmesg buffer is too small for #define DEBUG in acpi/ec.c, hopefully the part I have is enough. With the 3 patches applied, acpi keys work perfectly. Good job :-) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 20:01 EST --- Battery reporting seems to work fine with -47 (grabed from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=522761), which has this patches applied. But it introduced a new problem :(. CPU frequency scaling no longer works. The cpu stays at 2.17 Ghz. Trying to load the acpi-cpufreq module results into: FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq (/lib/modules/2.6.24.3-47.fc8/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko): No such device CPU info output: cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7400 @ 2.16GHz stepping: 6 cpu MHz : 2166.816 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 4337.31 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7400 @ 2.16GHz stepping: 6 cpu MHz : 2166.816 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips: 4333.51 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: Is this related to this patches or should I open a new bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 17:44 --- It also allows one to use xbacklight to control backlight level. Please check if the Ubuntu HAL config is using xbacklight, or if it is trying to access sysfs backlight classes directly. If HAL is being told to touch sysfs directly, there you have first of the root causes of the breakage. It won't be the only one. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 251744] Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Thousands of ACPI Error (evgpe-0711)... when external display device is connected to SVGA out port https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251744 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 21:44 EST --- David Shrader , can you confirm that the new kernel work for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 22:08 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) Battery reporting seems to work fine with -47 (grabed from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=522761), which has this patches applied. But it introduced a new problem :(. CPU frequency scaling no longer works. The cpu stays at 2.17 Ghz. Trying to load the acpi-cpufreq module results into: FATAL: Error inserting acpi_cpufreq (/lib/modules/2.6.24.3-47.fc8/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.ko): No such device [...] Is this related to this patches or should I open a new bug? OK, its unrelated to this patches. linux-2.6-acpi-fix-sizeof.patch was causing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:12 --- The sizeof patch from comment #33 causes acpi-cpufreq to fail when it's applied to 2.6.24.3 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 22:12 EST --- do you mean linux-2.6-acpi-fix-sizeof.patch caused a regression and the cpufreq driver work again after reverting it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9558] AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT, Evaluating _PSS - Frequency scaling not working after BIOS upgrade on Asus F3jc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9558 --- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:19 --- Chunk, Please attach dmesg acpidump -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 436959] kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: kernel-2.6.24.3-28.fc8 breaks ACPI battery status https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436959 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 22:20 EST --- Will you please add the boot option of cpufreq.debug=7 and attach the output of dmesg? Of course the output of acpidump is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:54 --- 'hald' runs as a system daemon with dropped priviledges, and doesn't have any dependency on X, so it can't run xbacklight directly. It would be possible to have a program running as your user connect to it to control the backlight (or even x connect directly), but AFAIK nothing does that yet. I'm pretty sure HAL uses sysfs to enumerate and control backlights currently. Plus, it is nice to have a way to control the backlight from the command line on a text console without X running. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 19:55 --- (In reply to comment #39) Now, about how to fix it. ACPI Video and X.org HAVE to talk to each other. X.org must be able to tell ACPI Video driver to go into an I'm not here mode, where it just acts as an ACPI notify-ACPI event repeater. And X.org is NOT to do *anything* to backlight hardware registers UNLESS it disabled ACPI video first (if it is loaded). Done. :) /sys/modules/video/parameters/brightness_switch_enabled can be used to enable/disable the ACPI video actions upon brightness hotkey events. Fix the bug WHERE IT REALLY IS. ACPI video, if it is indeed not working, needs to be fixed. BUT YOU WILL NEVER KNOW whether it is working right or not WHILE YOU HAVE X.org RUNNING. After the above is done, we have a chance of actually doing the right thing in every X.org driver (enable or disable kernel support, use or don't use the kernel backlight interface). Then, we will have ACPI video being called to *change* brightness when it is right to do so, and with exclusive access to the backlight control. Or we will have X.org changing the brightness directly in hardware, and ACPI video will know it must *block* (even for reading!) any attempts to access the ACPI AML backlight methods. Yes, currently users can still access the ACPI backlight methods via the backlight sys I/F, even with brightness_switch_enabled=N. Another switch is needed to control the access via backligh sys I/F. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 20:00 --- (In reply to comment #45) Or we will have X.org changing the brightness directly in hardware, and ACPI video will know it must *block* (even for reading!) any attempts to access the ACPI AML backlight methods. Yes, currently users can still access the ACPI backlight methods via the backlight sys I/F, even with brightness_switch_enabled=N. Another switch is needed to control the access via backligh sys I/F. we don't have this problem for Intel GPUs with IGD OpRegion support. The AML backlight methods won't change the backlight directly but try to notify the graphics driver instead. :) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9902] Video module creates input device, but no events happen.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9902 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|DEFERRED Resolution||WILL_FIX_LATER --- Comment #22 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 20:05 --- No, but sorry that it will take some time to make the hotkey work on your laptops. Let's track the progress of IGD OpRegion support in bug #10221. Defer this bug and mark it as WILL_FIX_LATER. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 10265] oops after resume from acpi S3
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10265 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO --- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 20:31 --- Does this happen occasionally or it happens every time back from S3? please set CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG, echo 0x8811f /sys/modules/acpi/parameters/debug_level echo 0x44 /sys/modules/acpi/parameters/debug_layer and attach the dmesg output after this oops. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
[Bug 9995] 2.6.25-rc1 regression - backlight controlls do not work - ThinkPad T61
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995 --- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-19 20:56 --- The only problem is that we can't trust the AML methods to begin with :-) And that we soon will need the same functionality on many ATI cards... IMO, we better just go for the complete job. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___ acpi-bugzilla mailing list acpi-bugzilla@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-bugzilla
