http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11421
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11415
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11415
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 00:21 ---
But closed source OS works very well. As I understood, Linux does not support
hardware well and has buggy kernel. Ok, I understand.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kern
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11415
--- Comment #9 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 00:22 ---
So your kernel has apm support, it has bug, but you will leave bug inside the
kernel so the kernel will be buggy. OK.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userpre
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10811
--- Comment #27 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 00:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=17428)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17428&action=view)
custom dsdt patch
Does cat hang if you just run cat 2 times?
And would
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11415
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED],
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10811
--- Comment #28 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 01:23 ---
If bug still exist for the latest kernel, please apply the debug patch at #14.
and then run "cat /proc//wchan"
is the pid of task who acquires the mutex, for example
DEBUG:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11345
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11374
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 01:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=17429)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17429&action=view)
try the debug patch
Will you please try the debug patch and see whether t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10811
--- Comment #29 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 02:05 ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> Created an attachment (id=17428)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17428&action=view) [details]
> custom dsdt patch
>
> Does cat h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11365
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17413|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11421
--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 04:32 ---
> /proc/acpi/thermal_zone is empty after booting.
IMO only the wrong trip point should be ignored. But it may be that Windows
also invalidates the whole thermal zone, don't know
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11345
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from [
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11415
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 08:45 ---
Oh may I report new circumstances?
I installed Ubuntu, default installation. And I put "acpi=off" parameters to
kernel - the same "bad" behavior.
But when there is no any par
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11374
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 09:25 ---
Hi Yakui,
The reason why acpi_boot_ec_enable exists is that ASUS does not allow for
EC.REG
method to be called too early.
With your patch you are doing just that, thus breakin
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11421
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 10:35 ---
Resolving WONTFIX is fine with me; I just wanted to document the problem and
workaround. Fixing the DSDT is pretty easy. Of course, it would be better if HP
wasn't releasing suc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #39 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 11:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=17439)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17439&action=view)
force c1e idle routine
Guys, can you please check what happens when you
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
--- Comment #24 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 12:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=17440)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17440&action=view)
kernel with first and second patches
sleep & hibernate don't still work
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #40 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 12:41 ---
Hi.. I've tried this patch on 2.6.27-rc4 system. No difference. And I still
can't boot machine with C1E at all. So I'm unable to get dmesg.
So I've added "!!! " to printk mess
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11426
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11396
--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 12:50 ---
# cat /proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCDD/brightness
levels: 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
current: 13
Sorry for insisting on this, but at some point in the past this has worke
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11396
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 12:56 ---
BTW, according to Packard Bell's site there is no new BIOS firmware version :/
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiv
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #41 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 13:08 ---
I think, that your idea was, that for some reason kernel use default_idle
instead of c1e_idle. Currently I can confirm, that kernel freezes using
c1e_idle(). I've added some pr
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 13:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=17443)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17443&action=view)
Verbose debug messages for arch/x86/kernel/process.c
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 13:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=17444)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17444&action=view)
Screenshot of last messages with applied force-c1idle.patch and debug inf
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 13:57 ---
Ok, before digging into it, I noticed we have no failing dmesg with apic debug
messages turned on. I'm thinking that maybe we're broadcasting too fast , and
this might be the p
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 14:04 ---
I've added a bit more printk to some files. And traced it to kernel/notifier.c.
System freezes somewhere in ret = nb->notifier_call(nb, val, v);
I can't debug it anymore sinc
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11426
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|bugs.osdl.or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 14:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=17446)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17446&action=view)
2.6.26 dmesg with apic=debug
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ker
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 14:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=17447)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17447&action=view)
2.6.26 dmesg with apic=debug nolapic_timer
I've used 2.6.26.3 release si
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11101
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 14:54 ---
No. It should use a broken kernel, but one that you can boot by pressing enter.
The first one after the commit you bisected to is fine.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11374
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 18:02 ---
Hi, Alexey
Understand what you said.
From the kernel source code it seems that the function of acpi_scan_init
follows the function of acpi_init in the boot phase. In my p
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10245
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
--- Comment #25 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 19:07 ---
Hi, Denys
Thanks for the test. From the log in comment #24 the warning message
disappears. But the sleep&hibernate still can't work.
Will you please do the following tes
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11396
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 19:27 ---
First, I'd say that the ACPI video extension support in this BIOS is definitely
buggy, no matter if it's the root cause of the inverted brightness issue.
(In reply to comment #
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11415
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REJECTED|REOPENED
Resolution|WILL_NOT_F
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11415
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: htt
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6712
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|REJECTED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
Summary: [regression] LID switch events are no longer reported
using /dev/input/event*
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.26-rc3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11345
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 22:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=17451)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17451&action=view)
Test patch
Attached patch should resolve the problem. Can you please try
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 22:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=17452)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17452&action=view)
acpidump of Clevo D410J
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.or
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|0 |1
--
Configure bugmail: http://bug
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10811
--- Comment #30 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 23:01 ---
Hung immediately again (2.6.26.3):
ACPI: DSDT 1EFD03F0, 3714 (r1 255II 255II0011 INTL 2002026)
ACPI: Override [DSDT-255II001], this is unsafe: tainting kernel
ACPI:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1752
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15320|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11428
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 23:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=17454)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=17454&action=view)
try the debug patch
Will you please try the attached debug patch on the l
46 matches
Mail list logo