http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #8 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2008-12-18 00:48 ---
Hi, Andeghost
Thanks for the info.
From the description it seems that there exists two issues:
a. Hotkey can't work well
b. the following warning messages:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12183
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #28 fro
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11164
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #17473|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11164
--- Comment #24 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2008-12-18 01:32 ---
Hi, lorincz
Thanks for the test.
In theory the mcount should be 25 after catting /proc/cmos. In the debug
patch the RTC cmos area of 0x40-44 is used. Maybe this are
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11857
--- Comment #41 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2008-12-18 01:39 ---
Hi, summan
thanks for the test. Now the issue is related with the incorrect GPI
routing of 00:00:1f.0 LPC bridge. But it is very strange that it can't be
initialized cor
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11164
--- Comment #25 from andras.lori...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 07:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=19360)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19360&action=view)
dmesg output
Hi,
The situation is still the same and the system
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #10 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 08:39 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Hi, Andeghost
> Thanks for the info.
> From the description it seems that there exists two issues:
> a. Hotkey can't work well
> b.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
denisius.s...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
KernelVersion|2.6.26.1, 2.6.26.2, |2.6.26.1, 2.6.26.2,
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12243
--- Comment #4 from auke-jan.h@intel.com 2008-12-18 10:29 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi, Auke
> By the way, why do you care that it will take more than 1s to initialize
> the hotkey driver on the eee-pc 901?
it blocks the e
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
Summary: Lenovo ThinkPad SL series: LCD brightness works in
procfs, buggy in sysfs
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.28-rc8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #1 from tetrom...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 13:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=19362)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19362&action=view)
original acpidump
Acpidump output attached (SL300 BIOS version 1.16)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #2 from tetrom...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 13:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=19363)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19363&action=view)
customized DSDT
I also tried a customized DSDT table (modified it in th
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #11 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2008-12-18 14:28
---
Since 2.6.26 is the latest kernel the reporter has tried it would be well worth
trying 2.6.28 when it is released (or even one of the more recent -rc
releases).
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_power-vi...@kernel-|rui.zh...@intel.com
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: h
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12243
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #12 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2008-12-18 17:50 ---
First of all, it seems we can not control the backlight via ACPI video unless
there is a BIOS fixup.
Second, the fujitsu driver can not catch the hotkey events, can it?
If i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12252
Summary: new oops on resume due to ACPI_PREEMPRTION_POINT()
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.28-rc8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12252
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #13 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2008-12-18 18:33
---
1. Good point - we need to see what effect a BIOS upgrade has.
2. That's a very good question. From what little information I've seen on the
subject it seems t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11164
--- Comment #26 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2008-12-18 18:50 ---
Hi, Lorincz
Thanks for so quick response. From the test the value of mcount is still
what we expected. As it is incorrect, I can't judge whether the suspend/resume
hangs
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12252
--- Comment #2 from yakui.z...@intel.com 2008-12-18 18:59 ---
Hi, Len
Will you please try the following patch and see whether it will help?
>http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122768138609610&w=2
thanks.
--
Configure bugm
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #4 from tetrom...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 19:07 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=19366)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19366&action=view) [details]
> patch: always update the props.br
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #5 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2008-12-18 19:32 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Created an attachment (id=19366)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19366&action=view) [details]
[deta
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11164
yakui.z...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19352|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #6 from tetrom...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 19:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=19368)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19368&action=view)
dmesg output
(In reply to comment #5)
> Never trust the brightness valu
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #14 from shell...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 21:22 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> 1. Good point - we need to see what effect a BIOS upgrade has.
> 2. That's a very good question. From what little information I've seen on the
>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12233
--- Comment #15 from jwoi...@physics.adelaide.edu.au 2008-12-18 21:39
---
I still think it's worth trying a 2.6.28-rc kernel at this point, so proceed
with your plans as outlined above and report back.
I should note that for the next
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #7 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2008-12-18 21:40 ---
please attach the result of "grep . /proc/acpi/video/*/*/brightness"
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving thi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
rui.zh...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19363|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12252
--- Comment #3 from len.br...@intel.com 2008-12-18 21:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=19370)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19370&action=view)
patch vs 2.6.28-rc8 from Wu Fengguang
this patch is now applied to the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12252
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12243
len.br...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|corenti...@iksaif.net |
AssignedTo|acpi_platform-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #9 from tetrom...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 22:51 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> please attach the result of "grep . /proc/acpi/video/*/*/brightness"
With my current DSDT:
# grep . /proc/acpi/video/*/*/brightness
/proc/acpi/v
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #10 from tetrom...@gmail.com 2008-12-18 23:08 ---
With your customized DSDT:
# grep . /proc/acpi/video/*/*/brightness
/proc/acpi/video/VGA/CRTD/brightness:
/proc/acpi/video/VGA/DVID/brightness:
/proc/acpi/video/VGA/LCDD/bri
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #11 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2008-12-18 23:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=19371)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19371&action=view)
source code of the customized DSDT
attached per Alexandre's request. :
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #12 from rui.zh...@intel.com 2008-12-18 23:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=19372)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=19372&action=view)
video debug patch
please apply this patch, and attach the dmesg output
39 matches
Mail list logo