http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12881
Lin Ming changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|--- |No
--- Comment #18 from Lin Ming 2009-03-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12684
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11717
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|--- |No
--- Comment #41 from ykzhao 2009-03-30 0
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12908
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui.zh...@intel.com
--- Comment #3 from Zh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12910
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui.zh...@intel.com
--- Comment #6 from Zh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12788
--- Comment #35 from ykzhao 2009-03-30 05:45:07 ---
Hi, James
How about this issue if only one cpu is used? (by adding the boot option of
"maxcpus=1")
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
--- Comment #29 from ykz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12170
--- Comment #27 from Jori Hardman 2009-03-30 03:47:37 ---
I applied the patch to the 2.6.29 kernel and it works like a charm. Thanks for
finding a solution.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Yo
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6058
--- Comment #30 from ykzhao 2009-03-30 03:38:52 ---
Hi, Aljas
Thanks for the test. The test result is weird. The content of DSDT table is
not changed in the course of suspned/resume.
From the log in comment #15 it seems that there exis
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
--- Comment #10 from Zhang Rui 2009-03-30 03:29:51 ---
so this also happens in the test in comment #4?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12936
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
--- Comment #9 from ykzh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12249
--- Comment #85 from Zhang Rui 2009-03-30 03:18:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=20728)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20728)
patch:video cleanup 7
please attach the patch on top of the previous patches and see if it helps
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
--- Comment #35 from ykz
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8737
--- Comment #43 from Zhang Rui 2009-03-30 02:58:04 ---
please do this test:
1. set CONFIG_PM_DEBUG and rebuild your kernel
2. echo core > /sys/power/pm_test
and then
3. echo mem > /sys/power/state
does the problem still exists when you run ste
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
--- Comment #28 from M. Vefa Bicakci 2009-03-30
01:31:13 ---
Hello,
I apologize for not responding earlier; I wanted to gather more data before
posting a message.
I took 2.6.24's source and reduced its spurious interrupt limit to 10
in "ker
DSDT.aml attached.
** Attachment added: "customized DSDT"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24496998/DSDT.aml
--
Lid state is incorrect (closed) after resume with lid open
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34389
You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
of the bug.
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12959
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|acpi_ot...@kernel-bugs.osdl |rui.zh...@intel.com
|.org
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12973
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|acpi_power-proces
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12973
Zhang Rui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rui.zh...@intel.com
--- Comment #2 from Zh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12973
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acpi-bugzi...@lists.sourcef
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12973
ykzhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yakui.z...@intel.com
--- Comment #1 from ykzh
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12973
Summary: cannot use cpufreq scaling with the 2.6.29 kernel and
an X3360 chip
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.29
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
T
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731
George Maizel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|--- |No
--- Comment #30 from George Maizel
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12788
--- Comment #34 from James Ettle 2009-03-29
15:17:08 ---
(In reply to comment #33)
> Hi, James
> Thanks for the test. It seems that the wakeups per second become normal
> after resuming if the boot option of "idle=nomwait" is used.
>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12013
Márton Németh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nm...@freemail.hu
--
Configure bugmai
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12013
--- Comment #35 from Márton Németh 2009-03-29 10:34:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=20723)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20723)
acpidump of Asus EeePC 901
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12013
--- Comment #34 from Márton Németh 2009-03-29 10:31:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=20722)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20722)
dmesg of 2.6.29 on EeePC 901
The EeePC 901 with kernel 2.6.29 does not wake up also from sus
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12170
--- Comment #26 from Alexey Starikovskiy 2009-03-29
07:39:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=20719)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20719)
separate MSI delays
Please check if this patch works?
--
Configure bugmail: http://
28 matches
Mail list logo
